ANALISIS TERHADAP TINGGINYA ANGKA PUTUS SEKOLAH SISWA SMP TERBUKA

Authors

  • T Effendy Suryana STKIP Siliwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/empowerment.v1i1p%25p.366

Abstract

The research was to get a description about the factors that caused SMP Terbuka drop out rates highly at SMP Terbuka Pacet and the cope efforts must be done by someone that concern to it. The focus are : (1) how is  the student’s motivation and a social economic conditions that cause drop out rates highly? (2) how is the human resources, facilities, and fund that cause drop out rates highly? (3) how is the leadership being done by head teacher that cause drop out rates highly? (4) how is the teaching learning process to cause drop out rates highly? (5) how is the societies and compulsory basic education coordination team support  that cause drop out rates highly? and (6) how are alternative efforts to reduce the drop out rates  that must be done by a head teacher, managers, teachers, parents, the societies and compulsory basic education coordination team at SMP Terbuka Pacet? As a conceptual reference, I wrote the administration theory, the leadership theory, and the open distance learning theory. The research was held at SMP Terbuka Pacet, Pacet Sub district, Bandung regency, with the main school is at SMP Negeri 1 Pacet and the independent learning places (TKB) are Padaulun, Ciherang, and Cisaat. This is a qualitative descriptive approachment, to describe a current fact at this time. The data and information were collected by interview, observation, and documentation. The results showed that main factor drop outs is economic factor. And less facilities in the independent learning places that cause students was bored in their learning activities. Based on the result above, the related ones  had better  find a fund for scholarship, in order to make a teaching learning activities at SMP Negeri 1 Pacet as main school, and to empower  all facilities in teaching learning process.

References

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1999. Panduan Manajemen Sekolah. Jakarta : Depdikbud, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum.

Depdiknas.Ikhtisar Data Pendidikan Nasional Tahun 2005/2006. 2006 .Jakarta : Depdiknas. ( www.depdiknas.go.id )

________. 2004.25 Tahun SMP Terbuka. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

________. 2004.SMP Terbuka Selayang Pandang. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Dinas Pendidikan Propinsi Jawa Barat. 2003. Buku Panduan Pengembangan SMP Terbuka. Bandung : Kegiatan Pembinaan SLTP Terbuka.

Engkoswara. 1987. Dasar-dasar Administrasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Kartono, Kartini. 1998. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan, Apakah Pemimpin Abnormal Itu. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Makmun, Abin Syamsudin. 2000. “Analisis Posisi Sistem Pendidikanâ€, Jakarta, Materi Pelatihan Tenaga Perencana Pendidikan, Biro Perencanaan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Miarso, Yusufhadi. 2004. Menyemai Benih Teknologi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Kencana.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Mulyana, Ris. R. 2007. Pelaksanaan Belajar Jarak Jauh SMP Terbuka (Studi Kasus Implementasi Kurikulum SMP Terbuka di Plumbon Jawa Barat. Jurnal Mimbar Pendidikan No. 2 Tahun XXVI.

Muhadjir, N. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta : Rake Sarasin.

Nawawi, H. 1984. Administrasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Gunung Agung.

Downloads

Published

2012-02-28