INCREASING THE COMPETENCE OF TUTORS IN CREATING TEACHING MATERIALS THROUGH IMPLEMENTING THE BLENDED LEARNING MODEL

Authors

  • Saiffullah Darlan Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Wahidin Wahidin Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Seth Miko Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Yesni Nopy Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Muhamad Affandi University of Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/empowerment.v14i2.5900

Keywords:

Competence of Tutors, teaching materials, Blended Learning Model

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the blended learning model in improving the competency of equivalency education tutors in developing teaching materials at PKBM Luthfillah, Palangka Raya City. The research employs action research methods consisting of two cycles, where each cycle includes the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. In the first cycle, the training focused on introducing the concept of blended learning and the use of online platforms. However, the results showed that only 40% of the tutors were able to effectively develop technology-based teaching materials. Based on the reflection results, the second cycle was more focused on intensive mentoring and practice in using interactive learning media. The results of the study showed a significant improvement, where 80% of the tutors successfully developed interactive teaching materials that were well-integrated between online and face-to-face components. In conclusion, the blended learning model has proven effective in enhancing tutor competency, although challenges such as limited access to technology still require further attention.

References

Affandi. (2020). The Contribution of the Literacy Village Program to Community Empowerment (A Descriptive Study on Nonformal Education Services in Literacy Villages). In Jurnal AKRAB, Volume XI, Issue 2/October.

Almeida, P. R., Jung, H. S., & Silva, L. Q. (2021). Return to class: Between presential teaching and distance education, new trends. Praksis. https://doi.org/10.25112/RPR.V3.2556

Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In Research design.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang sistem pendidikan nasional.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2012). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. In Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558

Hammond, M. (1990). Making adult education research more consistent with adult education principles. Studies in Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037900120101

Heinze, A., & Procter, C. (2004). Reflections on the use of blended learning. Education in a Changing Environment.

Kiru, E., & Abuya, B. (2023). Educational technology: The ethical and sociological imperative for equity and inclusion. In Handbook of Research on Advancing Equity and Inclusion Through Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6868-5.ch004

Knowles, M. S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education. Business.

Reed, Y., Davis, H., & Nyabanyaba, T. (2002). Investigating teachers’ ‘take-up’ of reflective practice from an In-service professional development teacher education programme in South Africa. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790200200185

Suharsimi, A. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). In Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Downloads

Published

2025-09-25