DESAIN PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKS SOSIAL-SOSIETAL DALAM PRAGMATIK DENGAN METODE KOOPERATIF TEKNIK INVESTIGASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v9i1.p1-10Keywords:
Group investigation technique, cooperative learning method, reflective teachingAbstract
Abstract Pragmatic learning must be research based. By basing on research, pragmatic learning in language majors and language education will be of high quality. Until now, pragmatic learning is still based on the views of Western experts. On the basis of that concern, the authors sought to examine specific culture-based pragmatics related to the socio-societal context. The results of the study are utilized in pragmatic learning. The main objective of this study is to describe the design of social-societal context learning models in pragmatics. The paradigm that was followed was the Ignasian-based reflective learning paradigm. The learning method applied is the cooperative learning method. The technique applied is a group investigation technique. Furthermore, this research is useful in the following matters: (a) improving and improving the quality of pragmatic learning in tertiary institutions; (b) produce researchers in the field of reliable pragmatics because they are used to wrestling with pragmatic research; (c) developing pragmatics, especially pragmatics based on specific culture.Keywords: Group investigation technique; cooperative learning method; reflective teaching Pembelajaran pragmatik harus berbasis riset. Dengan mendasarkan pada riset, pembelajaran pragmatik di jurusan-jurusan bahasa dan pendidikan bahasa akan berkualitas. Hingga sekarang, pembelajaran pragmatik masih didasarkan pada pandangan pakar Barat. Atas dasar keprihatinan itu, penulis berusaha meneliti pragmatik berbasis kultur spesifik terkait konteks sosial-sosietal. Hasil kajian tersebut dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran pragmatik. Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah menggambarkan desain model pembelajaran konteks sosial-sosietal dalam pragmatik. Paradigma yang diikuti adalah paradigma pembelajaran reflektif berbasis Ignasian. Metode pembelajaran yang diterapkan adalah metode pembelajaran kooperatif. Adapun teknik yang diterapkan adalah teknik investigasi kelompok (grup-investigation technique). Selanjutnya, penelitian ini bermanfaat dalam hal-hal berikut: (a) memperbaiki dan meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran pragmatik di perguruan tinggi; (b) menghasilkan periset-periset bidang pragmatik yang andal karena mereka sudah terbiasa bergulat dengan riset pragmatik; (c) mengembangkan ilmu pragmatik khususnya pragmatik yang berbasis kultur spesifik. Kata Kunci: Group investigation technique; cooperative learning method; pembelajaran reflektifÂReferences
Amuzu, E. K. (2012). Sociopragmatics of conversational codeswitching in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Linguistics.
Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157
Bach, K. (2008). Speech Acts and Pragmatics. In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757031.ch8
Barnard, R., Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2008). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588247
Derewianka, B. & Jones, P. (2012). Teaching Language in Context. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2012.06.007
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2015). Assessing Second Language Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.016
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Identifying a Research Problem, Question and Searching. Educational Research: An Introduction.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed. Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed.
Gretsch, C. (2009). Pragmatics and integrational linguistics. Language and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.02.010
Guthrie, K. L., & McCracken, H. (2010). Reflective pedagogy: Making meaning in experiential based online courses. Journal of Educators Online. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2010.2.2
Higgins, S. (2014). Critical thinking for 21st-century education: A cyber-tooth curriculum? Prospects. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9323-0
Latief, M. A. (2009). Penelitian Pengembangan. Universitas Stuttgart. https://doi.org/ja0257319 [pii]
Mey, J. L. L., Brown, K., & Mey, J. L. L. (2006). Pragmatics: Overview. In Encyclodpedia of language and linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1338
O’Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (2011). Introducing pragmatics in use. Introducing Pragmatics in Use. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830949
Palacio, M. A., & Gustilo, L. (2016). A pragmatic analysis of discourse particles in Filipino computer mediated communication. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-01
Rahardi, R. K. (2009). Pragmatik: Kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rahardi, R. K. (2017). Language Phatic in Specific Culture Perspective. In 1st International Conference on Education, Language, and Arts (pp. 1165–1174). Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Rahardi, R. K. (2018a). Elemen dan Fungsi Konteks Sosial, Sosietal, dan Situasional dalam Menentukan Makna Pragmatik Kefatisan Berbahasa. In Prosiding Seminar Tahunan Linguistik Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (SETALI 2018).
Rahardi, R. K. (2018b). Elemen dan Fungsi Konteks Sosial, Sosietal, dan Situasional dalam Menentukan Makna Pragmatik Kefatisan Berbahasa. In Prosiding Seminar Tahunan Linguistik Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (SETALI 2018) (pp. 654–658). Bandung: Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Bandung.
Rahardi, R. K. (2019a). Integrating social , societal , cultural , and situational contexts to develop pragmatics course learning materials : preliminary study integrasi sosial , sosial , budaya , dan konteks situasional untuk mengembangkan materi pembelajaran pragmatik : studi , 5(2), 169–178.
Rahardi, R. K. (2019b). Pragmatic Perspective on Phatic Functions and Language Dignity. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5C, May 2019), 261–268. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.E1039.0585C19
Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. In Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x
Richards, J. C. (1995). Towards reflective teaching. English Teacher’s Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0369-1
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2010). Method : Design , and Procedure Approach. Tesol Quarterly.
Rukiyati Sugiyo, & L. Andriani Purwastuti. (2017). Local Wisdom-Based Character Education Model in Elementary School in Bantul Yogyakarta Indonesia. Sino-US English Teaching. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2017.05.003
Schilling, J. (2006). On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.28
Science, L., Company, P., Long, M. H., Canagarajah, S., Peterson, R. A., Nagel, J., … Backus, A. (2017). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90022-X
Smith, E., Næss, K. A. B., & Jarrold, C. (2017). Assessing pragmatic communication in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Communication Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.06.003
Suszczyńska, M. (2011). Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.004
Travis, C. E. (2004). The ethnopragmatics of the diminutive in conversational Colombian Spanish. Intercultural Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X10000136
Wei, R. (2012). The effect of study abroad on L2 pragmatic development: A longitudinal investigation . Applied Linguistics.
