TWO TYPES OF REALIZATIONS OF MAKING REFUSAL IN SUNDANESE CONTEXT : A CASE STUDY

Euis Rina Mulyani

Abstract


This study was motivated by the previous research which suggests that In
Indonesian context, indirectness, especially when making a refusal, is viewed
as an indication of politeness. The purpose of the present study is to find out
whether or not there are Indonesian (especially Sundanese ethnic) people who
use indirectness with doing both saving and ‘loosing face’ their addressees
when making refusal. The subjects of this study were some Sundanese
people’s refusals in some natural conversations. Observation on people’s
natural conversations was done in collecting data. This study employed
qualitative analysis of data. The result of this study showed that the
realization of making refusal in Sundanese can be grouped into two:
expressed in indirectness with employing saving face only, and
expressed in indirectness with employing both saving face and ‘losing
face’. The two types of refusal strategies used by Sundanese people are
still in Indonesian culture of politeness.

KEYWORDS: Indirectness, politeness, saving face, and losing face


References


Aziz, E. Aminuddin. (n.d.). Aspek-aspek Budaya yang Terlupakan dalam Praktek Pengajaran Bahasa Asing. Retrieved on May 21, 2004 from http: www.ialf.edu/kipbipa/papers/E-AminudinAziz.doc.

Aziz, E. Aminudin. 2012a. The triadic Logic of Linguistic Pliteness Theories. Retrieved on April 18, 2013 from http://aminudin.staf.upi.edu/2012/02/17/the-triadic-logic-of-linguistic-politeness-theories/

Aziz, E. Aminudin. 2012b. Pragmatik Lintas Budaya. Retrieved on April 18, 2013 from http://aminudin.staf.upi.edu/2012/02/17/pragmatik-lintas-budaya.

Ebsworts, Miriam Eisenstein and Nobuko Kodama. 2001. The Pragmatics of Refusals in English and Japanese: Alternative approaches to negotiation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. [Abstract].

Joshua A., Fishman and Garcia, Ofelia (eds.). vol. 2011. Pp. 95-117. Doi: 10.1515 /ijsl.20011.014.

Grundy, Peter. 2000. Doing Pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Guo, Yinling. 2012. American Refusal Strategy: A Cross-cultural Approach. Chinese an Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 2, pp. 247-256. Doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.2.247-256.

Heigham, Juanita and Robert A. Croker. 2009. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics, A Practical Introduction. New York: Macmillan.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Limited.

Maxwell, Joseph A. 1996. Qualitative Research Design. California: Sage

Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Observing and Analysing Natural Language. New York: Basil Blackwell. Publications.

Punch, Keith F. 2009. Introduction to Research Methods in Education. London: Sage.

Silverman, David. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.

Tanck, Sharyl. 2002. Speech Acts of Refusal and Complaint: A Comparison of Native and Non-Native English Speakers’ Production. TESL. Spring 2002.

Thomas, Jenny. 1995. Meaning in Interaction. New York: Longman Group Limited.

Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1977. Introduction to Linguistics. McGraw Hill Book Company.

Wilkins, John R. 1979. Linguistics in Language Teaching. The English Language Book Society and Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v1i1.p%25p

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 428 times
pdf (Bahasa Indonesia) - 326 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.