BRIDGING BRAIN AND LANGUAGE: POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS NEUROEDUCATION IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

Authors

  • Dahlia Indahsari UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA
  • Him’mawan Adi Nugroho UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA
  • Ahmad Munir UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA

Keywords:

Neuroedukasi, Persepsi, ELT

Abstract

This study aims to explore postgraduate students' perceptions of the importance of Neuroeducation in English Language Teaching (ELT) and their awareness of its application. A mixed-methods approach was employed in this study. The study involved 30 postgraduate students from Master of Education programs at various universities. Questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data, while open-ended interviews were conducted to gather qualitative data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for the quantitative data and thematic analysis for the qualitative data. The findings reveal that postgraduate students perceive understanding brain function as crucial in ELT. Regarding the awareness of Neuroeducation, participants highlighted the significance of accessible neuroscience resources, with the highest mean score (M = 4.87) for the need to make neuroscience information easily available to educators. The study concludes that postgraduate students recognize the importance of Neuroeducation in creating personalized and inclusive learning environments, though challenges remain, such as the need for formal training. Thus, Neuroeducation is considered an interdisciplinary field that can bring insights into how the brain learns the knowlegde into more effective and inclusive teaching stratgies, particularly in English language teaching.

References

Agustina, R. S., & Rahaju, T. (2021). Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Inklusif di Kota Surabaya. Publika, 9(3), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v9n3.p109-124

Ansari, D., De Smedt, B., & Grabner, R. H. (2012). Neuroeducation–a critical overview of an emerging field. Neuroethics, 5, 105-117. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3

Basso, D., & Cottini, M. (2023). Cognitive Neuroscience and Education: Not a Gap to Be Bridged but a Common Field to Be Cultivated. Sustainability, 15(2), 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021628

Bhargava, A. V., & Ramadas, V. (2022). Implications of neuroscience/neuroeducation in the field of education to enhance the learning outcomes of the students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6502-6510.

Compagno, G., & Pedone, F. (2016). Teacher training paths between neuroeducation and professional learning community. In INTED2016 Proceedings (pp. 1743-1751). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.1366

Jorio, D. D. (2020). Synaptic Plasticity and Learning Processes: A Neuroeducation Perspective. OBM Neurobiology, 4(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2002063

Fragkaki, M., Mystakidis, S., & Dimitropoulos, K. (2022). Higher education faculty perceptions and needs on neuroeducation in teaching and learning. Education Sciences, 12(10), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100707

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature reviews neuroscience, 15(12), 817-824. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817

Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience (the Norton series on the social neuroscience of education). WW Norton & Company.

Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching. Corwin Press.

Jolles, J., & Jolles, D. D. (2021). On neuroeducation: Why and how to improve neuroscientific literacy in educational professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 752151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752151

Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Early language learning and literacy: Neuroscience implications for education. Mind, brain, and education, 5(3), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01121.x

Le Cunff, A. L., Wood, H. C., Kis-Herczegh, P., & Dommett, E. J. (2024). Research Priorities in Neuroeducation: Exploring the Views of Early Career Neuroscientists and Educators. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1117.

Luzzatto, E., & Rusu, A. S. (2019). Teacher Self-Efficacy, Attitudes Toward Change And Neuroeducation Perception: Tool Package Development. 113–122. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.06.15

Madua, A. E. (2022). Teaching English to the rythm of the brain. Journal of Neuroeducation, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1344/joned.v3i1.39456

Maros, M., Stapa, S. H., & Mohd Yasin, M. S. (2012). English language proficiency levels and needs of international postgraduate students: Implications and recommendations. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n13p181

Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (1993). Language and literacy learning in the early years: An integrated approach. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Pickering, S. J., & Howard‐Jones, P. (2007). Educators’ Views on the Role of Neuroscience in Education: Findings from a Study of UK and International Perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228x.2007.00011.x

Sahiti, Q., & Stamp, J. A. (2022). The Use of Visuals in Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: Recommendations for Educators. Teaching of Psychology, 49(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211000326

Serpati, L., & Loughan, A. R. (2012). Teacher Perceptions of NeuroEducation: A Mixed Methods Survey of Teachers in the United States. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(3), 174–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01153.x

Simoes, E., Foz, A., Petinati, F., Marques, A., Sato, J., Lepski, G., & Arévalo, A. (2022). Neuroscience Knowledge and Endorsement of Neuromyths among Educators: What Is the Scenario in Brazil? Brain Sciences, 12(6), 1990–2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060734

Sousa, D. A. (2023). Engaging the Rewired Brain. Corwin Press.

Zadina, J. (2014). Multiple pathways to the student brain: Energizing and enhancing

instruction. John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-03