Article Sidebar

Published
Jan 26, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 45

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematics is essential for individuals to solve everyday life problems. However, students remain insufficiently motivated in mathematics learning, necessitating the implementation of engaging teaching approaches integrated with other disciplines, such as STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics). This study investigated the effectiveness of a STEAM-based Project-Based Learning (PjBL) approach on mathematical literacy and character development among secondary school students. Utilizing a mixed-methods convergent parallel design, the research employed quantitative and qualitative techniques. The quantitative data collection used a literacy skills test to measure mathematical literacy. Meanwhile, the qualitative data collection to measure students' character utilized surveys, interviews, and observations. Quantitative data analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while qualitative data analysis employed triangulation, including data reduction, data presentation, and data verification stages. The study results revealed that students' mathematical literacy significantly improved after participating in STEAM-PjBL-based learning. Additionally, STEAM-PjBL fosters the development of students' character traits, including teamwork, communication, and responsibility, highlighting its potential to support holistic educational outcomes. These findings indicate that integrating STEAM principles with PjBL enhances academic performance and cultivates critical 21st-century skills.

Keywords

Character development Literacy skills Project-based learning STEAM-based learning

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331

  2. Ahmad, D. N., Astriani, M. M., Alfahnum, M., & Setyowati, L. (2021). Increasing creative thinking of students by learning organization with steam education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27146

  3. Akman, E., & Çakır, R. (2023). The effect of educational virtual reality game on primary school students’ achievement and engagement in mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1467-1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1841800

  4. Albeshree, F., Al-Manasia, M., Lemckert, C., Liu, S., & Tran, D. (2022). Mathematics teaching pedagogies to tertiary engineering and information technology students: a literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 1609-1628. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1837399

  5. Aleksić, G., Merrell, C., Ferring, D., Tymms, P., & Klemenović, J. (2019). Links between socio-emotional skills, behavior, mathematics and literacy performance of preschool children in Serbia. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(2), 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0387-8

  6. Alwiyah, D., & Imaniyati, N. (2018). Keterampilan mengajar guru dan kesiapan belajar siswa sebagai determinan terhadap hasil belajar siswa [Teacher teaching skills and student learning readiness as determinants of student learning outcomes]. Jurnal Manajerial, 17(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.17509/manajerial.v17i1.9767

  7. Andriyani, A., Santosa, A. B., & Saryadi, W. (2022). Effectiveness of Microsoft Kaizala and Google Classroom towards students’ mathematical communication skill and self-efficacy in learning statistics. Bulletin of Applied Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.12928/bamme.v2i1.5523

  8. Angraini, G., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMAN Kelas X di kota Solok pada konten biologi [Analysis of high-level thinking skills of grade X senior high school students in Solok city on biology content]. Journal of Education Informatic Technology and Science (JeITS), 1(1), 114-124.

  9. Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2023). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190

  10. Başaran, M., & Bay, E. (2023). The effect of project-based STEAM activities on the social and cognitive skills of preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 193(5), 679-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2022.2146682

  11. Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5), 23-37.

  12. Bertrand, M. G., & Namukasa, I. K. (2020). STEAM education: student learning and transferable skills. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-01-2020-0003

  13. Boice, K. L., Jackson, J. R., Alemdar, M., Rao, A. E., Grossman, S., & Usselman, M. (2021). Supporting teachers on their STEAM journey: A collaborative STEAM teacher training program. Education Sciences, 11(3), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030105

  14. Cai, J. (2023). Evaluation of blended teaching in STEAM education using structural equation model questionnaire technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(19), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i19.43873

  15. Chang, C.-Y., Du, Z., Kuo, H.-C., & Chang, C.-C. (2023). Investigating the impact of design thinking-based STEAM PBL on students’ creativity and computational thinking. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(6), 673-681. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3297221

  16. Chen, C.-C., & Huang, P.-H. (2023). The effects of STEAM-based mobile learning on learning achievement and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1761838

  17. Chen, R. H. (2021). Fostering students’ workplace communicative competence and collaborative mindset through an inquiry-based learning design. Education Sciences, 11(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010017

  18. Chistyakov, A. A., Zhdanov, S. P., Avdeeva, E. L., Dyadichenko, E. A., Kunitsyna, M. L., & Yagudina, R. I. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

  19. Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). STEAM teaching professional development works: effects on students’ creativity and motivation. Smart learning environments, 7(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00132-9

  20. Cunha, M. N., Figueiredo, J., Oliveira, I., & Maçães, M. (2024). Motivating students for success: A review of new projects in teaching based on STEM education. Economics: Time Realities, 71(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.15276/ETR.01.2024.8

  21. Diego-Mantecon, J.-M., Prodromou, T., Lavicza, Z., Blanco, T. F., & Ortiz-Laso, Z. (2021). An attempt to evaluate STEAM project-based instruction from a school mathematics perspective. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01303-9

  22. Dostál, J., Děrda, R., Částková, P., Mrázek, M., Kubrický, J., Steingartner, W., Bučková, H., Janu, M., & Kronáč, J. (2022). Innovative Concept of STEAM Education at Primary Schools in the Czech Republic-Support for Implementation in School Practice. In 2022 IEEE 16th International Scientific Conference on Informatics (Informatics), Poprad, Slovakia (pp. 60-66). https://doi.org/10.1109/Informatics57926.2022.10083467

  23. Duo-Terron, P., Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., & López-Núñez, J.-A. (2022). STEAM in primary education. impact on linguistic and mathematical competences in a disadvantaged context. Frontiers in Education, 7, 792656. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.792656

  24. Effendi, K. N. S., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Yaniawati, P. (2020). Reading text for school literacy movement in mathematics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.6731.145-154

  25. Fauzan, A., Harisman, Y., Yerizon, Y., Suherman, S., Tasman, F., Nisa, S., Sumarwati, S., Hafizatunnisa, H., & Syaputra, H. (2024). Realistic mathematics education (RME) to improve literacy and numeracy skills of elementary school students based on teachers’ experience. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p301-316

  26. Fisher, D., Yaniawati, P., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2017). The use of CORE model by metacognitive skill approach in developing characters junior high school students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 050010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995137

  27. Gabriel, F., Buckley, S., & Barthakur, A. (2020). The impact of mathematics anxiety on self-regulated learning and mathematical literacy. Australian Journal of Education, 64(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120947881

  28. Gellert, U., Jablonka, E., & Keitel, C. (2013). Mathematical literacy and common sense in mathematics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 57-73). Routledge.

  29. Hadiyanti, N. F. D., Hobri, H., Prihandoko, A. C., Susanto, S., Murtikusuma, R. P., Khasanah, N., & Maharani, P. (2021). Development of mathematics e-module with STEM-collaborative project based learning to improve mathematical literacy ability of vocational high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1), 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012031

  30. Hardman, J. (2019). Towards a pedagogical model of teaching with ICTs for mathematics attainment in primary school: A review of studies 2008-2018. Heliyon, 5(5), e01726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01726

  31. Harisman, Y., Noto, M. S., & Hidayat, W. (2021). Investigation of students' behavior in mathematical problem solving. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p235-258

  32. Herrero, A. C., Recio, T., Tolmos, P., & Vélez, M. P. (2023). From the STEAM engine to STEAM education: An experience with pre-service mathematics teachers. Mathematics, 11(2), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020473

  33. Herro, D., Quigley, C., Plank, H., Abimbade, O., & Owens, A. (2022). Instructional practices promoting computational thinking in STEAM elementary classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 38(4), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2022.2087125

  34. Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A study on the impact of STEAM education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772

  35. Hsu, Y.-C. (2020). Exploring the learning motivation and effectiveness of applying virtual reality to high school mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 438-444. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080214

  36. Indahwati, S. D., Rachmadiarti, F., & Hariyono, E. (2023). Integration of PJBL, STEAM, and learning tool development in improving students' critical thinking skills. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(6), 808-818. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i6.434

  37. Ishartono, N., Razak, R. b. A., Kholid, M. N., Arlinwibowo, J., & Afiyah, A. N. (2024). Integrating STEAM into flip flop model to improve students’ understanding on composition of functions during online learning. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p45-60

  38. Iyer, V., Naandheny, S., & Manjuri, D. (2023). A Review of Pedagogical Advancements in Mathematics Education for Future Engineers. In 2023 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computing and Automation (ICAECA), Coimbatore, India (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAECA56562.2023.10200980

  39. Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education—A case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198

  40. Kadir, D., Judijanto, L., Widodo, J., Sidik, E. A., Haq, M. S., & Santosa, T. A. (2023). The effect STEAM based discovery learning model on students thinking ability: Meta-analysis study. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 1245-1253. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5944

  41. Kariadinata, R., Yaniawati, R. P., Juariah, J., Sugilar, H., & Muthmainah, A. (2019). Spatial thinking ability and mathematical character students through Cabri 3D with a scientific approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(7), 077094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/7/077094

  42. Khairani, C. P., & Mudjiran, M. (2022). Pengembangan modul bimbingan dan konseling untuk meningkatkan karakter tangguh siswa dalam belajar [Development of guidance and counseling modules to improve students' resilient character in learning]. Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia, 7(4), 642-650.

  43. Kim, Y. E., Morton, B. G., Gregorio, J., Rosen, D. S., Edouard, K., & Vallett, R. (2019). Enabling creative collaboration for all levels of learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 1878-1885. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808678115

  44. Körtesi, P., Simonka, Z., Szabo, Z. K., Guncaga, J., & Neag, R. (2022). Challenging examples of the wise use of computer tools for the sustainability of knowledge and developing active and innovative methods in STEAM and mathematics education. Sustainability, 14(20), 12991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142012991

  45. Kozakli Ulger, T., Bozkurt, I., & Altun, M. (2022). Analyzing in-service teachers' process of mathematical literacy problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985

  46. Kurniawati, R. P., Gunawan, I., & Marlina, D. (2020). Mathematic literation abilities based on problem solving abilities in first class 4 of elementary school. In 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020), (pp. 186-192). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201112.033

  47. Li, J., Luo, H., Zhao, L., Zhu, M., Ma, L., & Liao, X. (2022). Promoting STEAM education in primary school through cooperative teaching: A design-based research study. Sustainability, 14(16), 10333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610333

  48. Lin, C.-L., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2021). The effect of a pedagogical STEAM model on students’ project competence and learning motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x

  49. Mahlow, C., & Hediger, A. (2021). Education as loosely coupled system of technology and pedagogy. On Education: Journal for Research and Debate, 4(12), 1-11.

  50. Murtiyasa, B., & Perwita, W. R. G. (2020). Analysis of mathematics literation ability of students in completing PISA-oriented mathematics problems with changes and relationships content. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3160-3172. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080745

  51. Nantschev, R., Feuerstein, E., González, R. T., Alonso, I. G., Hackl, W. O., Petridis, K., Triantafyllou, E., & Ammenwerth, E. (2020). Teaching approaches and educational technologies in teaching mathematics in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(12), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120354

  52. Ng, A. (2024). Empowering Malaysian early childhood practitioners’ sustainable inclusive practices through the ‘integrating and navigating Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics’(inSTEAM) framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), em2531. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15579

  53. Ní Shé, C., Ní Fhloinn, E., & Mac an Bhaird, C. (2023). Student engagement with technology-enhanced resources in mathematics in higher education: A review. Mathematics, 11(3), 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787

  54. Novita, R., & Herman, T. (2021). Digital technology in learning mathematical literacy, can it helpful? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012027

  55. Ozkan, G., & Umdu Topsakal, U. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 441-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586

  56. Pellegrini, M., Lake, C., Neitzel, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2021). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A meta-analysis. AERA Open, 7(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986211

  57. Putri, A. S., Prasetyo, Z. K., Purwastuti, L. A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Putranta, H. (2023). Effectiveness of STEAM-based blended learning on students’ critical and creative thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22506

  58. Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., Shekell, C., Cian, H., & Jacques, L. (2020). Connected learning in STEAM classrooms: opportunities for engaging youth in science and math classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1441-1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10034-z

  59. Rahmawati, Y., Taylor, E., Taylor, P. C., Ridwan, A., & Mardiah, A. (2022). Students’ engagement in education as sustainability: Implementing an ethical dilemma-STEAM teaching model in chemistry learning. Sustainability, 14(6), 3554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063554

  60. Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A., & Alsina, Á. (2022). Networking between ethnomathematics, STEAM education, and the globalized approach to analyze mathematical connections in daily practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 18(3), em2085. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11710

  61. Setiawati, S., Herman, T., & Jupri, A. (2017). Investigating middle school students’ difficulties in mathematical literacy problems level 1 and 2. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909(1), 012063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012063

  62. Shi, A., Wang, Y., & Ding, N. (2022). The effect of game–based immersive virtual reality learning environment on learning outcomes: designing an intrinsic integrated educational game for pre–class learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 721-734. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1681467

  63. Silawati, E. (2019). New media literacy in the context of early childhood education (An overview from Indonesian kindergarten future teachers). In International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, (pp. 12-16).

  64. Siregar, Y. E. Y., Rahmawati, Y., & Suyono, S. (2023). The impact of an integrated STEAM project delivered via mobile technology on the reasoning ability of elementary school students. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 410-428. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1446

  65. Stacey, K. (2015). The international assessment of mathematical literacy: PISA 2012 framework and items. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 771-790). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_43

  66. Suganda, E., Latifah, S., Irwandani, Sari, P. M., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Mehadi Rahman, M. (2021). STEAM and Environment on students’ creative-thinking skills: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012101

  67. Sukmawati, E., Imanah, N. D. N., & Rantauni, D. A. (2023). Implementation and challenges of project-based learning of STEAM in the university during the pandemic: A systematic literature review. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 9(1), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v9i1.25177

  68. Supianti, I. I., Yaniawati, P., Osman, S. Z. M., Al-Tamar, J., & Lestari, N. (2022). Development of teaching materials for e-learning-based statistics materials oriented towards the mathematical literacy ability of vocational high school students. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p237-254

  69. Umbara, U., Prabawanto, S., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2023). Combination of mathematical literacy with ethnomathematics: How to perspective sundanese culture. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 393-414. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p393-414

  70. Wahba, F. A.-A., Tabieh, A. A., & Banat, S. Y. (2022). The power of STEAM activities in enhancing the level of metacognitive awareness of mathematics among students at the primary stage. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), em2185. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12562

  71. Wijaya, T. T., Hidayat, W., Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., & Talib, C. A. (2024). Exploring contributing factors to PISA 2022 mathematics achievement: Insights from Indonesian teachers. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p139-156

  72. Witdiya, T., Supriadi, G., Supriatin, A., & Annovasho, J. (2023). The effect of STEAM learning on improving each indicator of students’ creative thinking in physics learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v7i1.7158

  73. Yaniawati, P., Fisher, D., Permadi, Y. D., & Yatim, S. A. M. (2023). Development of mobile-based digital learning materials in blended learning oriented to students’ mathematical literacy. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(9), 1338-1347. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.9.1936

  74. Yaniawati, P., & Indrawan, R. (2024). Metode penelitian: Konsep, teknik, dan aplikasi [Research methods: Concepts, techniques and applications]. Refika Aditama.

  75. Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American psychologist, 75(9), 1269-1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794

  76. Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., . . . Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y

  77. Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Leong, C., Mao, Y., & Yuan, Z. (2024). Bridging stories and science: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning investigation into child learning in STEM. NeuroImage, 285, 120486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120486

  78. Ziatdinov, R., & Valles, J. R. (2022). Synthesis of modeling, visualization, and programming in GeoGebra as an effective approach for teaching and learning STEM topics. Mathematics, 10(3), 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030398