Article Sidebar

Published
Sep 20, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 380 Download : 607

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is motivated by the problem-solving ability of students is still low, and the teaching materials used cannot be studied independently. The purpose of this study was to determine students' profiles about students' problem-solving abilities seen from indicators of choosing and implementing the problem-solving strategies to solve mathematical and outside mathematics using open-ended-based virtual reality games. A virtual reality game through open-ended-based learning media is made with the concept of moving the situation of learning mathematics in the real world into a virtual world displayed through a computer. This research used a qualitative method with a case study design. The research instrument used is a question of mathematical problem-solving ability through open-ended-based and interview transcripts. The research subjects were six eighth grade Junior High School students consisting of two students with high knowledge, two with moderate knowledge, and two with common knowledge. The result showed that students have different mathematical problem-solving abilities from each indicator, namely 1) identifying the adequacy of data for problem-solving, 2) making mathematical models from everyday situations or problems, 3) selecting and implementing strategies to solve math and math problems outside of using virtual reality games through open-ended based.

Keywords

Educational Game Mathematics Open Ended Virtual Reality

Article Details

References

  1. Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students' errors in solving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133

  2. Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, A. I. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan disposisi matematik siswa kelas XI SMA Putra Juang dalam materi peluang [Analysis of problem solving ability and mathematical disposition of class XI Putra Juang high school students in probability materials]. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.62

  3. Algozzine, B., & Hancock, D. (2017). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers (third edition ed.). Teachers College Press.

  4. Balta, N., & Asikainen, M. (2019). Introductory students’ attitudes and approaches to Physics problem solving: Major, achievement level and gender differences [Physics education, problem solving in physics, AAPS survey, attitudes, gender]. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 378-387. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.666

  5. Branca, N. A. (1980). Problem solving as a goal, process, and basic skill. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem solving in school mathematics (pp. 3-8). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  6. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria VA: ASCD.

  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

  8. Harisman, Y., Noto, M. S., Bakar, M. T., & Amam, A. (2017). The different patterns of gesture between genders in mathematical problem solving of geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012039

  9. Harisman, Y., Noto, M. S., & Hidayat, W. (2021). Investigation of students' behavior in mathematical problem solving [Behavior; Naïve; Problem solving; Routine; Semi-Sophisticated; Sophisticated]. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p235-258

  10. Hino, K. (2007). Toward the problem-centered classroom: trends in mathematical problem solving in Japan. Zdm, 39(5), 503-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0052-1

  11. Hutajulu, M., Perbowo, K. S., Alghadari, F., Minarti, E. D., & Hidayat, W. (2022). The process of conceptualization in solving geometric-function problems [Bloom Taxonomy; Cognitive Process; Conceptualization; Geometric-Function; Knowledge Dimension]. Infinity Journal, 11(1), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i1.p145-162

  12. Hwang, G.-J., Hung, C.-M., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7

  13. Kariadinata, R. (2021). Students’ reflective abstraction ability on linear algebra problem solving and relationship with prerequisite knowledge [Prerequisite Knowledge; Problem Solving; Reflective Abstraction]. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p1-16

  14. Karlimah, K., Hamdu, G., Pratiwi, V., Herdiansah, H., & Kurniawan, D. (2021). The development of motion comic storyboard based on digital literacy and elementary school mathematics ability in the new normal era during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1987(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1987/1/012026

  15. Kosyvas, G. (2016). Levels of arithmetic reasoning in solving an open-ended problem. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 356-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1072880

  16. Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236-260. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-264

  17. Muir, T., & Beswick, K. (2005). Where did I go wrong? Students’ success at various stages of the problem-solving process. The 28th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, Australia.

  18. Muir, T., Beswick, K., & Williamson, J. (2008). “I’m not very good at solving problems”: An exploration of students’ problem solving behaviours. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(3), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.04.003

  19. Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. Zdm, 29(3), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0001-z

  20. Pertiwi, C. M., Rohaeti, E. E., & Hidayat, W. (2021). The students' mathematical problem-solving abilities, self-regulated learning, and VBA Microsoft word in new normal: A development of teaching materials. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p17-30

  21. Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Purwono, H. (2018). Desain game edukasi berbasis android pada materi logika matematika [Android-based educational game design on mathematical logic material]. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v2i2.919

  22. Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Syaefullah, D. (2017). Game edukasi RPG matematika [Math RPG educational game]. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v6i1.1701

  23. Pramuditya, S. A., Noto, M. S., & Syaefullah, D. (2018). The educational game design on relation and functionmaterials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012138. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012138

  24. Prihandika, Y. A., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2021). How are student’s spatial intelligence for geometry problem-solving? International Conference of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (I-CMME 2021),

  25. Sahulata, R. A., Wahyudi, A., Wuwungan, B. G., & Nayoan, M. A. (2016). Aplikasi virtual reality pengenalan kerangka tubuh manusia berbasis android [Android-based virtual reality application for human skeleton recognition]. CogITo Smart Journal, 2(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v2i2.30.204-215

  26. Setiawan, R. H., & Harta, I. (2014). Pengaruh pendekatan open-ended dan pendekatan kontekstual terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan sikap siswa terhadap matematika [The effect of an open-ended and contextual approach on problem solving abilities and students' attitudes towards mathematics]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2679

  27. Suwanroj, T., Leekitchwatana, P., & Pimdee, P. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis of the essential digital competencies for undergraduate students in Thai higher education institutions [confirmatory factor analysis, CFA, digital competency, undergraduate students, Thai higher education institutions]. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 340-356. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.645

  28. Valdez, J., & Bungihan, M. (2019). Problem-based learning approach enhances the problem solving skills in Chemistry of high school students [problem-based learning, problem solving skill, pedagogy, chemistry education]. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 282-294. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.631

  29. Wahyuni, R., Efuansyah, E., & Sukasno, S. (2020). Developing student worksheet based on missouri mathematics project model by using think-talk-write strategy of class VIII [Missouri Mathematics Project; Student Worksheet; Think Talk Write Strategy; 4-D]. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p81-92

  30. Widodo, S. A., Ibrahim, I., Hidayat, W., Maarif, S., & Sulistyowati, F. (2021). Development of mathematical problem solving tests on geometry for junior high school students. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2973