Yulyanti Harisman
Yaya Sukjaya Kusumah
Kusnandi Kusnandi
Muchamad Subali Noto


Based on literature review Three categories of teachers are: good, very good, and excellent which are viewed from aspects of beliefs, attitude, depth of pedagogical and didactic aspects, and teacher reflection in the learning process has been obtained in previous studies. Various external aspects are considered to affect teacher professionalism in learning about mathematical problem solving. These aspects need to be studied to maximize the teacher professionalism. This study will examine these external aspects, ranging from teaching experience, educational background, and experience in participating in training to improve teacher competencies. This type of qualitative research with survey methods was chosen as a research method. Three teachers from three junior high schools with different clusters were selected as research subjects. Each teacher is given short questions related to this. The results obtained are the experiences of the trainings that teachers follow in increasing their competence and teacher's educational background have more significant influence on teacher professionalism compared to the experience or length of teacher teaching.


Learning Process; Problem Solving; Teacher Profesionalism


Beswick, K. (2007). Teachers’ Beliefs That Matter in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics 65: 95–120.

Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ Beliefs about School Mathematics and Mathematicians’ Mathematics and Their Relationship to Practice. Journal Education Study Math 79:127-147.

Ernest, P. (1989). The Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitude of the Mathematics Teacher: a Model. Journal of Education for Teaching 15(1): 12-33.

Harisman, Y .(2018a). Beliefs of Junior High School Teachers on Learning Process on Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157 (032112): 1-9.

Harisman, Y .(2018b). Teachers’ Reflections on Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1088 (012011): 1-8.

Harisman, Y .(2018c). The Attitude of Senior High School Teachers on Mathematical Problem Solving. Presented to Advances in Mathematics, Science, and Engineering for Elementary Schools (SAMSES), Yogyakarta.

Harisman, Y. (2018d). Pedagogis and Didaktis of Junior High School Teachers on Learning Process on Mathematical Problem Solving. Presented to Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science International Seminar at UPI, Bandung.

Harisman, Y. (2018e). Analysis of Student Behavior in Mathematical Problem Solving and Teacher Professionalism in Learning Process at Junior High Schools in Bandung. Disertation.

Harisman, Y. (2019). How Teacher Professionalism Influences Student Behaviour in Mathematical Problem-Solving Process. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1188 (012080): 1 – 9

Muir, T. (2008). I’m Not Very Good at Solving Problems”: An Exploration of Student’s Problem Solving Behaviours. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 27: 228-241.

Muir, T., & Beswick, K.(2007). Simulating Reflection on Practice: Using the Supportive Classroom Reflection Process. Journal Mathematics Teacher Education And Development. Spesial Issue 8: 74-79.

Opolot, C. (2014). Improving Communication Skills in Science and Mathematics Education for Quality Student Outcomes. presented to the 1st International Science and Mathematics Education Conference, 7th- 9th August, Makerere University; Uganda.

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Ulug, M., Ozden, M. S., Eryilmaz, A (2011). The Effects of Teachers’ Attitudes of Students’ Personality and Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 738 – 742

Zoest, L. R. V., Jones, G. A., & Thornton, C. A. (1994). Beliefs about Mathematics Teaching Held by Pre-service Teachers Involved in a First Grade Mentorship Program. Mathematics Education Research Journal 6(1): 37-55

Zsoldos, L. (2015). Changing Pre-Service Primary-School Teachers’ Attitude Towards Mathematics by Collaborative Problem Solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 186: 174-182.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p%25p

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 128 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.