Article Sidebar

Published
Feb 28, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1879 Download : 927

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematical communication skills is an important role in mathematics learning. However, the importance of mathematical communication skills has not been fully realized in learning, especially circle material. Design a learning material based on mathematical communication is one way to develop this ability.  The preliminary study produced the findings of an epistemological learning obstacle so that students' mathematical communication skills were still in the low category. This study aimed to analyze learning obstacle and designing learning materials based on the material mathematical communication circle. This study is design research that contained two stages of Didactical Design Research (DDR), didactic situation and metapedadidactional stage. Research result obtained are students difficulties in relating the material defining elements of the circle with their own language, identifying circle elements that were known and explaining through pictures, calculating the circumference and distance of circular objects based on problems, calculating the surface area of circular objects based on the problems, and rearrange the formula which states the relationship of circle elements. To solve that learning obstacle, we recommend some learning trajectory in a circle that useful for teachers. This design of learning material is valid and practical to implement in the classroom.

Keywords

didactical design research circle learning obstacle mathematical communication

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abdussakir, A. (2012). Pembelajaran Geometri Sesuai Teori Van Hiele. Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 2(1).
  2. Baroody, A. J., & Coslick, R. T. (1993). Problem solving, reasoning, and communicating, K-8: Helping children think mathematically. Prentice Hall.
  3. Dedy, E., & Sumiaty, E. (2017). Desain didaktis bahan ajar matematika SMP berbasis learning obstacle dan learning trajectory. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 2(1), 69-80.
  4. Greenes, C., & Schulman, L. (1996). Communication processes in mathematical explorations and investigations. PC Elliott and MJ Kenney (Eds.).
  5. Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 5-23.
  6. Hung, D. W. L. (1997). Meanings, contexts, and mathematical thinking: The meaning-context model. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(4), 311-324.
  7. Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191-212.
  8. Johar, R., Patahuddin, S. M., & Widjaja, W. (2017). Linking pre-service teachers’ questioning and students’ strategies in solving contextual problems: A case study in Indonesia and the Netherlands. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1), 101-128.
  9. Jonassen, D. H. (2010). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
  10. Martin, T. S., McCrone, S. M. S., Bower, M. L. W., & Dindyal, J. (2005). The interplay of teacher and student actions in the teaching and learning of geometric proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(1), 95-124.
  11. Munawaroh, N., Rohaeti, E. E., & Aripin, U. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Kategori Kesalahan Menurut Watson dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Komunikasi Matematis Siwa SMP. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(5), 993-1004.
  12. Noto, M. S., Pramuditya, S. A., & Fiqri, Y. M. (2018). Design of learning materials on limit function based mathematical understanding. Infinity Journal, 7(1), 61-68.
  13. Rosita, C. D. (2016). The development of courseware based on mathematical representations and arguments in number theory courses. Infinity Journal, 5(2), 131-140.
  14. Rosita, C. D., Nopriana, T., & Dewi, I. L. K. (2017). Bahan Ajar Aljabar Linear Berbasis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 266-272.
  15. Sulistiawati, S., Suryadi, D., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Desain Didaktis Penalaran Matematis untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP pada Luas dan Volume Limas. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 135-146.
  16. Tiffani, F., Surya, E., Panjaitan, A., & Syahputra, E. (2017). Analysis Mathematical Communication Skills Student At The Grade IX Junior High School. IJARIIE-ISSN (O)-2395-4396, 3.
  17. Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical design research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3-12.
  18. von Glasersfeld, E., & Steffe, L. P. (1991). Conceptual models in educational research and practice. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Educative, 91-103.
  19. Walle, J. A., & Jhon, A. (2001). Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concepts. Elementary and Middle School. Mathe-matics: Teaching Developmentally, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.