Article Sidebar

Published
Feb 5, 2021
Download
PDF Supplementary Files
Statistic
Read Counter : 544 Download : 507

Main Article Content

Abstract

Communication skills are an essential aspect that students need to possess by students who want to succeed in their studies, where students' mathematical communication can organize mathematical thinking both orally and in writing. While AQ is intelligent in facing difficulties, a student must face the problems that exist in them. This study aims to determine the profile of prospective mathematics prospective teacher's mathematical communication skills in terms of adversity quotient. This study was conducted on mathematics education students in the 6th semester of Universitas PGRI Semarang. This research is a descriptive qualitative study. Subjects taken from 57 respondents were three students in the category of climbers, campers, and quitters. Written tests and interviews do data collection. Indicators of mathematical communication skills used in this study include drawing, writing, and mathematical expression. The results showed that the subject climber can meet all the indicators of mathematical communication skills and can be said to be good. Subject campers tend to meet all indicators of mathematical communication skills, have the power of communication in indicators drawing, and be quite useful. Quitter's subject tends not to meet all the communication indicators. The subject does not answer the drawing indicator's problem, and the writing and mathematical expression indicators are still wrong.

Keywords

Adversity Quotient Mathematical Communication Ability

Article Details

References

  1. Ansari, B. I. (2012). Komunikasi matematik dan politik. Banda Aceh: Yayasan Pena.

  2. Fridanianti, A., Purwati, H., & Murtianto, Y. H. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam menyelesaikan soal aljabar kelas VII SMP N 2 Pangkah ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif dan kognitif impulsif. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 11-20. doi:10.26877/aks.v9i1.2221

  3. Hampson, M., Patton, A., & Shanks, L. (2011). Ten ideas for 21st century education. London: Innovation Unit.

  4. Hapsari, V. S., Nizaruddin, N., & Muhtarom, M. (2019). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Mata Pelajaran Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(6), 267-278. doi:10.26877/imajiner.v1i6.4853

  5. Hidayat, W., Herdiman, I., Aripin, U., Yuliani, A., & Maya, R. (2018). Adversity quotient (AQ) dan penalaran kreatif matematis mahasiswa calon guru. Jurnal Elemen, 4(2), 230-242.

  6. Hidayat, W., & Husnussalam, H. (2019). The adversity quotient and mathematical understanding ability of pre-service mathematics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012025. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012025

  7. Hidayat, W., Noto, M. S., & Sariningsih, R. (2019). The influence of adversity quotient on students’ mathematical understanding ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 032077. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032077

  8. Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, W., & Prabawanto, S. (2018). The Mathematical Argumentation Ability and Adversity Quotient (AQ) of Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239-248. doi:10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248

  9. Kartika, E. D., & Yazidah, N. I. (2019). analisis kemampuan pembuktian matematis pada matakuliah analisis real berdasarkan adversity quotient. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 152-157. doi:10.31000/prima.v3i2.1385

  10. Murtafiah, W. (2016). Kemampuan komunikasi matematika mahasiswa calon guru matematika dalam menyelesaikan masalah persamaan diferensial ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 31-41.

  11. Nartani, C. I., Hidayat, R. A., & Sumiyati, Y. (2015). Communication in mathematics contextual. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 2(4), 284-287.

  12. Nopiyani, D., Turmudi, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2016). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik berbantuan geogebra untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 45-52. doi:10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.259

  13. Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia PISA Result and Impact on The Reading Learning Program in Indonesia. International Conference on Interdisciplinary Language, Literature and Education (ICILLE 2018), 373-377. doi:10.2991/icille-18.2019.77

  14. Paradesa, R., & Ningsih, Y. L. (2017). Pembelajaran matematika berbantuan Maple pada mata kuliah kalkulus integral terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 3(1), 70-81. doi:10.19109/jpmrafa.v3i1.1442

  15. Paramita, L. W. (2017). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis ditinjau dari adversity quotient melalui penerapan model pembelajaran SSCS pada siswa kelas VIII (Doctoral dissertation). Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

  16. Salam, R. (2017). Efektivitas penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think pair share (tps) untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri dan komunikasi matematis. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 20(2), 108-116.

  17. Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century?. ERF Working Papers Series, No. 15. Paris: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight.

  18. Soh, T. M. T., Arsad, N. M., & Osman, K. (2010). The relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards physics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 546-554. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073

  19. Son, A. L. (2015). Pentingnya Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. Gema Wiralodra, 7(1), 1-8.

  20. Stoltz, G. P. (2000). Adversity quotient: Mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

  21. Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

  22. Syarifah, T. J., Sujatmiko, P., & Setiawan, R. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Tertulis Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar pada Siswa Kelas XI MIPA 1 SMA Batik 1 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika (JPMM) Solusi, 1(2), 1-19.

  23. Ulfa, K., Buchori, A., & Murtianto, Y. H. (2017). Efektivitas Model Guided Discovery Learning untuk Video Pembelajaran dalam Mengetahui Perbedaan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 2(2), 267-275. doi:10.30651/must.v2i2.888

  24. Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di era global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 263-278.

  25. Yuniarti, D. A. F. (2015). Analisis hasil penilaian diagnostik kemampuan komunikasi matematis dalam pembelajaran osborn berdasarkan adversity quotient (Tesis). Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.