Article Sidebar

Published
Feb 5, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 682 Download : 446

Main Article Content

Abstract

The article presents a marginal region mathematics teachers' perception of ICT as learning media and the type of ICT media used in mathematics classrooms. A survey was designed including two domains:  the usability and the importance of ICT. A questionnaire was administered to 84 mathematics teachers in marginal regions. The respondents were chosen conveniently based on their accessibility and availability. About 50% of marginal region mathematics teachers do not use ICT in teaching. The most common media used is Microsoft Office software to present teaching materials from internet or digital sources. Using the Rasch model, the data show that mathematics teachers' perception of the usage and importance of ICT as a media of mathematics learning can be categorized as 'medium' level. Mathematics teachers in the marginal regions consider ICT as mathematics learning media to be fairly important.

Keywords

ICT Marginal Region Perception

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Afidah, A. N., Doom, M., & Putri, R. N. S. (2017). Laporan Kinerja Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Tahun 2017. Jakarta: Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.

  2. Ahern, T. C. (2016). A waterfall design strategy for using social media for instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3), 332-345. doi:10.1177/0047239515615853

  3. Albalaw, A. S. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ perception of using social media in their teaching in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 111-131.

  4. Alghamdi, I., Goodwin, R., & Rampersad, G. (2011). E-government readiness assessment for government organisations in developing countries. Computer and Information Science, 4(3), 3–17. doi:10.5539/cis.v4n3p3

  5. Ali, G., Haolader, F. A., & Muhammad, K. (2013). The role of ICT to make teaching-learning effective in higher institutions of learning in Uganda. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(8), 4061–4073.

  6. Amin, M. (2016). Akses dan penggunaan internet pitalebar di wilayah perbatasan (Indonesia–Papua Nugini dan Indonesia–Timor Leste). Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komunikasi, 18(1), 35-50.

  7. Bakar, K. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). Exploring the effectiveness of using GeoGebra and e-transformation in teaching and learning Mathematics. Proc. of Intl. Conf. of Advanced Educational Technologies EDUTE, 2, 19-23.

  8. Blum, C., & Parette, H. P. (2015). Universal design for learning and technology in the early childhood classroom. In Young children and families in the information age, 165-182. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9184-7_10

  9. Bond, T., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2020). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429030499

  10. Bush, W. S. (2005). Improving research on mathematics learning and teaching in rural contexts. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(8), 1-11.

  11. Chaerul, M., & Aisyah, S. (2014). Implikasi corporate social responsibility (CSR) melaui entrepreneur school di daerah tertinggal berbasis 3E (education, entrepreneurship, environment) menuju millennium development goals (MDGS) 2015. Jurnal PENA: Penelitian dan Penalaran, 1(1), 31-41.

  12. Djuwendah, E., Hapsari, H., Renaldy, E., & Saidah, Z. (2013). Strategi pengembangan daerah tertinggal di Kabupaten Garut. Sosiohumaniora, 15(2), 167-177.

  13. Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1469-1483. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.014

  14. Drijvers, P., Boon, P., & Van Reeuwijk, M. (2011). Algebra and technology. In Secondary Algebra Education, 179-202. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-334-1_8

  15. Eyyam, R., & Yaratan, H. S. (2014). Impact of use of technology in mathematics lessons on student achievement and attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(1), 31S-42S. doi:10.2224/sbp.2014.s31

  16. Gandal, N., Markovich, S., & Riordan, M. H. (2018). Ain't it “suite”? Bundling in the PC office software market. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2120-2151. doi:10.1002/smj.2797

  17. Gautam, K. K., & Agrawal, P. C. (2012). Impact and utilization of projectors in higher education with low energy consumption and last long batties in WSN environment. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Technology, 3(9), 449-455.

  18. Hismanoglu, M. (2012). Prospective EFL teachers' perceptions of ICT integration: A study of distance higher education in Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 185-196.

  19. Howley, C. B., Howley, A. A., & Huber, D. S. (2005). Prescriptions for rural mathematics instruction: Analysis of the rhetorical literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(7), 1-16.

  20. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2016). Koordinasi strategis percepatan pelaksanaan program pembangunan daerah tertinggal untuk mendukung PP no. 78 tahun 2014 dan Perpres No. 131 tahun 2015. Jakarta: Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

  21. Koesnandar, A. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pendayagunaan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi (Tik) Untuk Pendidikan Di Daerah Terpencil, Tertinggal, Dan Terdepan. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 122-142. doi:10.31800/jtp.kw.v1n2.p122--142

  22. Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79-105. doi:10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712

  23. Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. M. (2011). Predicting the continued use of Internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 91-99. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.490956

  24. Lin, J. M. C., Wang, P. Y., & Lin, I. C. (2012). Pedagogy* technology: A two‐dimensional model for teachers' ICT integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 97-108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01159.x

  25. Linacre, J. M. (2011). A user’s guide to winsteps ministeps: Rasch-model computer program. Oregon: Winsteps.com.

  26. Muhson, A. (2010). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(2), 1-10. doi:10.21831/jpai.v8i2.949

  27. Nicol, C., Archibald, J. A., & Baker, J. (2013). Designing a model of culturally responsive mathematics education: Place, relationships and storywork. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(1), 73-89. doi:10.1007/s13394-012-0062-3

  28. Nurseto, T. (2011). Membuat media pembelajaran yang menarik. Jurnal Ekonomi dan pendidikan, 8(1), 19-35. doi:10.21831/jep.v8i1.706

  29. Perbowo, K. S., Maarif, S., & Pratiwi, A. (2019). Perception of mathematics teachers in marginal regions toward the use of ICT and manipulative tools as learning media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012042. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012042

  30. Safitri, M., Hartono, Y., & Somakim, S. (2013). Pengembangan media pembelajaran matematika pokok bahasan segitiga menggunakan macromedia flash untuk siswa kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 62-72. doi:10.33830/jp.v14i2.358.2013

  31. Smith, R. C., Shin, D., & Kim, S. (2017). Prospective and current secondary mathematics teachers’ criteria for evaluating mathematical cognitive technologies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(5), 659-681. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2016.1264635

  32. Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (edisi revisi). Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

  33. Syahza, A., & Suarman. (2013). Strategi pengembangan daerah tertinggal dalam upaya percepatan pembangunan ekonomi pedesaan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 14(1), 126–139. doi:10.23917/jep.v14i1.166

  34. Tim Indikator TIK Pusat Litbang PPI. (2015). Hasil survei indikator TIK 2015 rumah tangga dan individu. Jakarta: Badan Litbang SDM Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika.

  35. Tossavainen, T., & Faarinen, E. C. (2019). Swedish Fifth and Sixth Graders’ Motivational Values and the Use of ICT in Mathematics Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1776. doi:10.29333/ejmste/108533

  36. Triyanto, E., Anitah, S., & Suryani, N. (2013). Peran kepemimpinan kepala sekolah dalam pemanfaatan media pembelajaran sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas proses pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 226-238.

  37. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of curriculum studies, 44(3), 299-321. doi:10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

  38. Waterhouse, S., & Rogers, R. O. (2004). The importance of policies in e-learning instruction. Educause quarterly, 27(3), 28-39.

  39. Widodo, S., Irfan, M., Leonard, L., Fitriyani, H., Perbowo, K., & Trisniawati, T. (2019). Visual Media in Team Accelerated Instruction to Improve Mathematical Problem-Solving Skill. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and Technology for an Internet of Things. European Alliance for Innovation (EAI). doi:10.4108/eai.19-10-2018.2281297