Article Sidebar

Published
Jan 29, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1829 Download : 1526

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is motivated by the poor performance of students in particular mathematical power. One reason is that learning tends to be centered on teachers who emphasize the procedural process, mechanistic task and less provide opportunities for students to develop the ability to think mathematically. In terms of learning, each individual has their advantages and disadvantages to absorb the lessons given. But in the world of education is now known various methods in order to meet the demands of individual differences, one of which is STIFIn to determine the dominance of machine intelligence to make students more comfortable in the learning process that is expected to enhance the mathematical power. This research approach is qualitative descriptive that seeks to analyze the characteristics of students’ mathematical power in terms of STIFIn. This research was conducted in SMAN 2 Kota Serang, with research subjects are five students of eleven grade derived from each type STIFIn different categories according to STIFIn. Instruments in this study are mathematical power test and interview. The results showed that mathematical power of Thinking and Sensing type has higher than the other type, followed by the type Feeling, Intuiting and the last is the type of Instinct.

Keywords

mathematical power STIFIn

Article Details

References

  1. Cai, J., Lane, S., & Jakabcsin, M. S. (1996). The Role of Open-Ended Tasks and Holistic Scoring Rubrics: Assessing Students’ Mathematical Reasoning and Communication. Communication in Mathematics, K-12 and Beyond, 137-145.
  2. Djohar, M. S. (2003). Pendidikan Strategis, Alternatif untuk Pendidikan Masa Depan Menuju Masyarakat Madani. Bandung: Tarsito.
  3. IMSTEP-JICA (1999). Monitoring Report on Current Practice on Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning. Bandung: IMSTEP-JICA
  4. Japar. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Setting Kooperatif Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Matematis Dan Keterampilan Sosial. Journal of EST, 1 (1), 12-26.
  5. Lutfiananda & Rosyidi. (2014). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Open-Ended Siswa SMP dengan Tipe STJ dan NFJ dalam Kepribadian Myers-Briggs Type Indicators (MBTI) pada Materi Ukuran Pemusatan Data. Mathedunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3 (2).
  6. Marpaung, Y. (2003). Perubahan Paradigma Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah. In Makalah. Disampaikan dalam Seminar Pendidikan Matematika di USD Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta (pp. 27-28).
  7. Moleong, J. L. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
  9. Poniman, F. (2009). STIFIn personality mengenali mesin kecerdasan anda. Bekasi : PT. STIFIn fingerprint.
  10. Poniman, F. (2012). Penjelasan Hasil Tes STIFIn Mengenali Cetak Biru Hidup Anda. Bekasi: PT STIFIn fingerprint.
  11. Ratnaningsih, N. (2008). Berbagai Keterampilan Berpikir Matematik. Makalah Disajikan dalam Acara Seminar Pendidikan Matematika di Universitas Siliwangi Tasikmalaya pada Tanggal 8 Maret 2008. Tasikmalaya.
  12. Rosita, C. D. (2013). Peranan Psikologi Pembelajaran Terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Lingkungan Belajar Matematika. Infinity, 2 (2), 136-143
  13. Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berfikir dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. Handout perkuliahan FPMIPA UPI. Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan
  14. Suradi. (2006). Interaksi Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Secara Kooperatif. Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Surabaya: Tidak diterbitkan.