Main Article Content

Abstract

This study is aimed to examine the quality of quantum learning imfluence toward the enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability of Senior High School students, both viewed entirely and based on mathematical initial ability (MIA) category.  In particular, this study is aimed to examine enhancement difference of students’ mathematical problem solving ability in a whole and in each level of mathematical initial ability (high, medium and low) between students who receive quantum learning and students who receive conventional learning. This study use experimental quasi with pretests-posttest control group design.  Population of this study are Senior High School students in Bogor City. Data is obtained through problem solving ability test and mathematical initial ability data. The result of study showed that students who receive quantum learning have enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability which is higher than students who receive conventional learning. There is no difference enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability both entirely and in each level of mathematical initial ability, except for students with high level of initial mathematical ability

Keywords

Quantum Learning Mathematical Problem Solving Ability

Article Details

References

  1. Cahyo, A. N. (2013). Panduan Aplikasi Teori-Teori Belajar Mengajar Teraktual dan Terpopuler. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.
  2. DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (1999). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Penerbit Kaifa.
  3. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal Physics, 66, 64-74.
  4. Hendriana, H. (2012). Pembelajaran Matematika Humanis dengan Metaphorical Thinking Untuk Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa. Infinity, 1(1), 90-103.
  5. Ibrahim. (2008). Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2, 90-99.
  6. NCTM. (2012). 2011-2012 NCTM Program Report of SPA Assessments. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.
  7. Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve it: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
  8. Sabandar, J. (2008). Thinking Classroom dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah. Simposium Internasional. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  9. Santrock, J. W. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.
  10. Soekisno, R. B. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Infinity, 4(2), 120-139.
  11. Sumiati, & Asra. (2009). Metode Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima.
  12. Thoifuri. (2008). Menjadi Guru Inisiator. Semarang: RaSAIL Media Group.
  13. Uno, H. B. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
  14. Yosodipuro. (2013). Siswa Senang Guru Gemilang. Strategi Mengajar yang Menyenangkan dan Mendidik dengan Cerdik. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.