STUDENTS' GEOMETRIC THINKING ON TRIANGLES: MUCH IMPROVEMENT IS NEEDED
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
A look into students’ misconceptions help explain the very low geometric thinking and may assist teachers in correcting errors to aid students in reaching a higher van Hiele geometric thinking level. In this study, students’ geometric thinking was described using the van Hiele levels and misconceptions on triangles. Participants (N=30) were Grade 9 students in the Philippines. More than half of the participants were in the van Hiele’s visualization level. Most students had imprecise use of terminologies. A few had misconceptions on class inclusion, especially when considering isosceles right triangles and obtuse triangles. Very few students correctly recognized the famous Pythagorean Theorem. Implications for more effective geometry teaching are considered.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.References
Atebe, H. U. (2008). Student's van Hiele levels of geometric thought and conception in plane geometry: a collective case study of Nigeria and South Africa. Doctoral dissertation. Makhanda: Rhodes University.
Atebe, H. U., & Schafer, M. (2010). Beyond teaching language: towards terminological primacy in learners' geometric conceptualisation. Pythagoras, 2010(71), 53-64. doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v0i71.7
Bamberger, H. J., Oberdorf, C., & Schultz-Ferrell, K. (2010). Math misconceptions: PreK-grade 5: From misunderstanding to deep understanding. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Banerjee, R., & Subramaniam, K. (2012). Evolution of a teaching approach for beginning algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 351-367. doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9353-y
Barrett, J. E., & Clements, D. H. (2003). Quantifying path length: Fourth-grade children's developing abstractions for linear measurement. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 475-520. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2104_4
Brandell, J. L. (1994). Helping students write paragraph proofs in geometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 87(7), 498-502. doi:10.5951/MT.87.7.0498
Confrey, J. (1990). Chapter 1: A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. Review of research in education, 16(1), 3-56. doi:10.3102/0091732X016001003
Contreras, R. S. (2009). Investigating the van hiele levels of geometric understanding of high school students on quadrilaterals. Masteral Thesis. Manila: De La Salle University. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3787
Crawford, M. L. (2001). Teaching contextually. Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Texas: Cord.
de Villiers, M. (2010). Algumas reflexões sobre a teoria de van Hiele. Educação matemática pesquisa: Revista do programa de estudos pós-graduados em educação matemática, 12(3), 400-431.
Drews, D., Dudgeon, J., Hansen, A., Lawton, F., & Surtees, L. (Eds.). (2005). Children′ s errors in mathematics: Understanding common misconceptions in primary schools. London: SAGE.
Edwards, T. G. (2000). Some big ideas of algebra in the middle grades. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle school, 6(1), 26-31. doi:10.5951/MTMS.6.1.0026
Fitriyani, H., Widodo, S. A., & Hendroanto, A. (2018). Students’ geometric thinking based on van Hiele’s theory. Infinity Journal, 7(1), 55-60. doi:10.22460/infinity.v7i1.p55-60
French, D. (2004). Teaching and learning geometry. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 3, i-196. doi:10.2307/749957
Graeber, A. O., Tirosh, D., & Glover, R. (1989). Preservice teachers' misconceptions in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 95-102. doi:10.2307/749100
Groth, R. E. (2005). Linking theory and practice in teaching geometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 99(1), 27-30. doi:10.5951/MT.99.1.0027
Gutiérrez, A., Jaime, A., & Fortuny, J. M. (1991). An alternative paradigm to evaluate the acquisition of the van Hiele levels. Journal for Research in Mathematics education, 22(3), 237-251. doi:10.2307/749076
Johnston-Wilder, S., & Mason, J. (2005). Developing thinking in geometry. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Jones, K. (2003). Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry. In L. Haggarty (Ed.). Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice (pp. 121–139). London: Routledge.
Lim, S. K. (2011). Applying the van Hiele theory to the teaching of secondary school geometry. Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 32–40.
Luneta, K. (2015). Understanding students' misconceptions: an analysis of final Grade 12 examination questions in geometry. Pythagoras, 36(1), 1-11. doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v36i1.261
Ma, H. L., Lee, D. C., Lin, S. H., & Wu, D. B. (2015). A study of van Hiele of geometric thinking among 1st through 6th graders. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1181-1196. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1412a
Mason, M. (1998). The van Hiele levels of geometric understanding. The professional handbook for teachers: Geometry, 4, 4-8.
Mayberry, J. (1983). The van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers. Journal for research in mathematics education, 14(1), 58-69. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.14.1.0058
Metila, R. A., Pradilla, L. A. S., & Williams, A. B. (2016). The challenge of implementing mother tongue education in linguistically diverse contexts: The case of the Philippines. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5), 781-789. doi:10.1007/s40299-016-0310-5
Radatz, H. (1979). Error analysis in mathematics education. Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 10(3), 163-172. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.10.3.0163
Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Parmar, R. S., & Garrison, R. (2011). Geometry. In F. Fennell (Ed.). Achieving fluency: Special education and mathematics (pp. 163–196). Reston, Va: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Senk, S. L. (1989). Van Hiele levels and achievement in writing geometry proofs. Journal for research in mathematics education, 20(3), 309-321. doi:10.2307/749519
Solaiman, N. P., Magno, S. N., & Aman, J. P. (2017). Assessment of the third year high school students’ van Hiele levels of geometric conceptual understanding in selected secondary public schools in Lanao del Sur. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 6(3), 603-609. doi:10.25255/jss.2017.6.3.603.609
Swan, M. (2001). Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics. In P. Gates (Ed.). Issues in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 147–165). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203469934
van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2019). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (10th ed.). London: Pearson Education UK.
van der Sandt, S., & Nieuwoudt, H. D. (2003). Grade 7 teachers' and prospective teachers' content knowledge of geometry. South African Journal of Education, 23(3), 199-205.