MATHEMATICAL LITERACY’S VOCATIONAL STUDENTS BASED ON LOGICAL AND NUMERICAL REASONING
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Adonis, A. (2006). Primary Framework for Literacy and Mathematics. United Kingdom: Department Education and Skills.
Bokar, A. J. (2013). Solving ang Reflecting on Real-World Problems: Their Influences on Mathematical Literacy and Engagement in the Eight Mathematical Practises. Thesis: Ohio University.
Diezmann, C. M., Watters, J. J., & English, L. D. (2001). Implementing Mathematical Investigation with Young Children. Proceedings 24th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research. Sydney: Group of Australia.
Dowden, B. H. (2011). Logical Reasoning. California: California State University Sacramento.
Durrant-Law, G. (2013). Logical Thinking. Canberra: University of Canberra.
Kariadinata, R. (2012). Menumbuhkan Daya Nalar (Power Of Reason) Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Analogi Matematik. Infinity, 1(1), 10-18.
Kasihani, E. S. (2002). Contextual Learning and Teaching (CTL) (Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kontekstual). Prosiding Seminar Akademik, 2, pp. 1-6.
Krause, J., Dias, L. P., & Schedler, C. (2015). Krause, J., Dias, L.P., dan Schedler, C. Competency-Based Education: A Framework for Measuring Quality Courses. Online journal of Distance Learning administration Spring, 18(1), 1-9.
MacGregor, R. R. (2007). The Essential Practices of High Quality teaching and Learning. The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc.
Melville, W., & Yaxley, B. (2009). Contextual Opportunities for Teacher Professional Learning: The Experience of One Science Department. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4), 357-368.
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2010). Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, Inovatif dan Menyenangkan (PAIKEM). Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Murnane, R., Sawhill, I., & Snow, C. (2012). Literacy Challenges for the Twenty-First Century: Introducing the Issue. The Future of Children, 22(2), 3-15.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able to Put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89-100.
Riyanto, B., & Siroj, R. A. (2011). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Prestasi Matematika dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 111-127.
Rusmining, Waluya, S. B., & Sugianto. (2014). Analysis of Mathematics Literacy, Learning Constructivism and Character Education (Case Studies on XI Class of SMK Roudlotus Saidiyyah Semarang, Indonesia). International Journal of Education and Research, 2(8), 331 – 340.
Sandstorm, M., Nilsson, L., & Lilja, J. (2013). Displaying Mathematical Literacy-Pupils’ Talk about Mathematical Activities. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(2), 55 – 61.
Shadiq, F. (2004). Pemecahan Masalah, Penalaran dan Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: PPPG Matematika Yogyakarta.
Stacey, K. (2012). The International Assessment of Mathematical Literacy: PISA 20112 Framework and Items. 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Seoul, Korea: Coex.
Suyono. (2009). Pembelajaran Efektif dan Produktif Berbasis Literasi: Analisis Konteks, Prinsip, dan Wujud Alternatif Sebagai Implementasinya di Sekolah. Bahasa dan Seni, 37(2), 203-217.
Turner, R. (2011). Exploring Mathematical Competencies. Research Development, 24(5), 1-6.
Venkat, H., Graven, M., Lampen, E., & Nalube, P. (2009). Critiquing the mathematical literacy assessment taxonomy: Where is the reasoning and the problem solving? Pythagoras, 0(70), 43-56.
Wardhani, S., & Rumiati. (2011). Modul Matematika SMP Program Bermutu Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Jakarta: Kemendiknas dan PPPPTK.