Main Article Content


Geometric thinking skills are the perceived abilities of an individual to think and reason in geometric contexts. These skills acquired by students in geometry remain poor and unsettling because of the misconceptions that hinder the students in learning the components of geometry. The study described the common unplaceable patterns in geometric thinking of 153 mathematics education students in a state university in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Frequency Analysis was employed in the study to determine the number of occurrences of the patterns stressing the cause for students placed under level 0 or unplaceable. Van Hiele Achievement Test was used to gather the students’ performance in geometry at all levels, namely: visualization, analysis, informal deduction, deduction, and rigor. The findings attested that only 13.1% of the students managed the third level of the Van Hiele Levels while 43.1% of them were unplaceable. Common patterns were drawn and describe to understand the consequences in geometric thinking ability at level 0. These observable patterns were grouped into core-remedial, topical-corrective, and close-corrective groups. The clusters will enable educational institutions to address the individual gaps in geometry.


Geometry Mathematics Performance Proving

Article Details


  1. Abu, M. S., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2013). Improving the levels of geometric thinking of secondary school students using geometry learning video based on Van Hiele theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 2(1), 16-22.

  2. Alex, J. K., & Mammen, K. J. (2012). A survey of South African grade 10 learners’ geometric thinking levels in terms of the Van Hiele theory. The Anthropologist, 14(2), 123-129.

  3. Atebe, H. U. (2008). Student's van Hiele levels of geometric thought and conception in plane geometry: a collective case study of Nigeria and South Africa. Doctoral dissertation. Rhodes University Grahamstown, South Africa. Retrieved from

  4. Erdogan, F. (2020). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers' problem posing abilities in context of Van Hiele levels of geometric thinking. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(2).

  5. Groth, R. E. (2005). Linking theory and practice in teaching geometry. The Mathematics Teacher MT, 99(1), 27-30.

  6. Idris, N. (2009). The impact of using Geometers’ Sketchpad on Malaysian students’ achievement and van Hiele geometric thinking. Journal of mathematics Education, 2(2), 94-107.

  7. Kamina, P., & Iyer, N. N. (2009). From concrete to abstract: Teaching for transfer of learning when using manipulatives. In Northeastern Educational Research Association (NERA) Annual Conference. Retrieved from

  8. Ko, Y.-Y., & Knuth, E. (2009). Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 68-77.

  9. Marchis, I. (2012). Preservice Primary School Teachers' Elementary Geometry Knowledge. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2), 33-40.

  10. Meng, C. C., & Sam, L. C. (2013). Enhancing primary pupils' geometric thinking through phase-based instruction using the geometer's sketchpad. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 28, 33-51.

  11. Mistretta, R. M. (2000). Enhancing geometric reasoning. Adolescence, 35(138), 365.

  12. Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS advanced 2015 international results in advanced mathematics and physics. Boston: Boston College TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

  13. Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions In Geometry And Suggested Solutions For Seventh Grade Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720-729.

  14. Pegg, J., & Tall, D. (2010). The Fundamental Cycle of Concept Construction Underlying Various Theoretical Frameworks. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers (pp. 173-192). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  15. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The Linguistic Challenges of Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Research Review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139-159.

  16. Van de Walle, J., Karp, K., & Bay-Williams, J. (2014). Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally (eight international edition). Essex: Pearson, 417-431.

  17. van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing Geometric Thinking through Activities That Begin with Play. Teaching Children Mathematics TCM, 5(6), 310-316.

  18. Walker, C. M., Winner, E., Hetland, L., Simmons, S., & Goldsmith, L. (2011). Visual thinking: Art students have an advantage in geometric reasoning. Creative Education, 2(1), 22-26.

  19. Zanzali, N. A. A. (2000). Designing the mathematics curriculum in Malaysia: Making mathematics more meaningful. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Retrieved from