THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS BY USING GUIDED-DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL AND COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL JIGSAW TYPE

Anna Angela Sitinjak
Herman Mawengkang

Abstract


The type of this study is a quasi-experiment study with its purpose to know any difference of students’ achievement in mathematics which using the model of guided discovery learning with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type.The population of this study is all students in SMA N 3 P. Siantar. The sampling technique applied was cluster random sampling. The experimental class I that chosen is X-1 consisted of 36 students, meanwhile the experimental class II that chosen is X-6 consisted of 36 students. The instrument used to measure the students’ mathematics achievement was a essay test. The normality test used was Lilliefor’s test, gotten that data is normal and the homogeneity test by using Fisher test, gotten that data is homogeny. The data analysis technique was t-test at the level of significance a = 5%. The study result showed that there is the difference of students’ achievement in mathematics which using the guided discovery learning model with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type in grade X SMA N 3 P. Siantar where obtained             14 tcalculation">  = 2.504 at a = 0.05 and 14ttable=">   14t(0.975,70)">  = 1.995, then   14tcalculation>ttable"> ..


Keywords


Guided Discovery, Cooperative of JIGSAW Type, Mathematics Achievement

References


Baumeister, R. F. and Vohs, K. D., (2007), Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, SAGE Publications, California.

Bruce, R. W., (2002), Cooperative Learning: A Standard for High Achievement In A Nutshell Series, SAGE Publishing, California.

Cetin, Y., (2004), Teaching Logarithm by Guided Discovery Learning and Life Application, Thesis, Secondary Science and Mathematics Education, The Middle East Technical University, Turkish.

Cohen, et al., (2007), Research Method in Education Sixth Edition, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, London.

Depdiknas, (2013), Model Pembelajaran Penemuan (Discovery Learning), Kementerian Pendidikan dan kebudayaan.

International Bureau of Education (IBE), (2011), World Data on Education: Indonesia VII Ed, UNESCO, at http://www.ibe.unesco.org/ (accessed on November 2014).

Martinus, et al, (2014), Online Mathematics Module: Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Melalui Model Pembelajaran Generatif, Jurnal Didaktik Matematika 1: 75-84.

OECD, (2010), PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary, at http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/dec/03/pisa-results-country-best-reading-maths-science (accessed on Desember 2014).

Pebriani, H, (2010), Pengaruh Pembelejaran Discovery dan Pembelajaran Kooperatif JIGSAW terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa dan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa SMP Swasta PGRI 2 Medan, Thesis, UNIMED, Medan.

Qorri’ah, (2011), Penggunaan jMetode Guided Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung, Skripsi, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

Sitorus, Wilda, (2014), Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa yang Diajar dengan Metode Guided Discovery dan Metode Behavior Modification pada Sub Pokok Bahasan Lingkaran di Kelas VIII SMP Budisatrya Medan Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014,Skripsi, FMIPA, UNIMED, Medan.

Sudjana, (1984), Metoda Statistika, TARSITO, Bandung.

Sugiyono, (2009), Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, ALFABETA, Bandung.

Tim Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan FIP-UPI, (2007), Ilmu dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Bagian 3 Pendidikan Disiplin Ilmu, Imperial Bhakti Utama, Bandung.

Westwood, P.S., (2008), What Teachers Need to Know about Teaching Methods, Aust Council for Ed Research (ACER) Press, Australia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i1.pXXX-XXX

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 31 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.