Main Article Content


The type of this study is a quasi-experiment study with its purpose to know any difference in students’ achievement in mathematics which using the model of guided discovery learning with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type. The population of this study is all students in SMA N 3 P. Siantar. The sampling technique applied was cluster random sampling. The experimental class I that chosen is X-1 consisted of 36 students, meanwhile, the experimental class II that chosen is X-6 consisted of 36 students. The instrument used to measure the students’ mathematics achievement was an essay test. The normality test used was Lilliefor’s test, get that data is normal and the homogeneity test by using Fisher test, get that data is homogeny. The data analysis technique was t-test at the level of significance α = 5%.The study result showed that there is the difference of students’ achievement in mathematics which using the guided discovery learning model with cooperative learning model JIGSAW type in grade X SMA N 3 P. Siantar where obtained tcalculation = 2.504 at a = 0.05 and ttable = t(0.975,70)= 1.995, then tcalculation = ttable


Guided Discovery JIGSAW Mathematics Achievement

Article Details


  1. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  2. Hendriana, H., Hidayat, W., & Ristiana, M. G. (2018). Student teachers’ mathematical questioning and courage in metaphorical thinking learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 948, No. 1, p. 012019). IOP Publishing.
  3. Herman, T. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Self Confidence Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. EDUHUMANIORA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 140-151.
  4. Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity Quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Turunan Fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15-28.
  5. Huda, M. K. (2016). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Investigasi Kelompok untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus. Infinity Journal, 5(1), 15-24.
  6. Janssen, F. J., Westbroek, H. B., & van Driel, J. H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science, 42(1), 67-90.
  7. Martunis, M., Ikhsan, M., & Rizal, S. (2014). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas melalui Model Pembelajaran Generatif. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(2), 75-84.
  8. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American psychologist, 59(1), 14.
  9. Rahmawati, F., Fitriana, L., & Setiawan, R. (2017). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kuantum dan Discovery Learning terhadap Prestasi Belajar ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Aturan Sinus, Kosinus, dan Luas Segitiga di SMA Negeri 5 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika SOLUSI, 1(6), 82-91.
  10. Sabidin, Z., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., Nihra, M., & Said, H. M. (2014). A Meta-Analysis: Pedagogical Strategies for Teaching Mathematics among Aboriginal Students. In International Education Postgraduate Seminar 2014 (p. 552).
  11. Sari, D. M. (2017). Analysis of Students’mathematical Communication Ability by using Cooperative Learning Talking Stick Type. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 183-194.
  12. Sugandi, A. I. (2013). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dengan Setting Kooperatif Jigsaw Terhadap Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMA. Infinity Journal, 2(2), 144-155.
  13. Wagensveld, B., Segers, E., Kleemans, T., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Child predictors of learning to control variables via instruction or self-discovery. Instructional Science, 43(3), 365-379.
  14. Yuliana, Y., Tasari, T., & Wijayanti, S. (2017). The Effectiveness Of Guided Discovery Learning To Teach Integral Calculus For The Mathematics Students Of Mathematics Education Widya Dharma University. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 01-10.