Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRAK Hasil belajar pecahan diharapkan sesuai dengan tujuan yang telah di tetapkan. Kenyataannya siswa mengalami kesulitan menyelesaikan pecahan. Dalam menjalankan proses belajar guru harus mempertimbangkan tingkat kesiapan siswanya untuk mengikuti proses belajar. Upaya yang dilakukan adalah memilih pengetahuan siswa dari pengalaman belajarnya yang dapat dijadikan untuk menjembatani antara pengalaman belajarnya dengan materi baru, sehingga mereka lebih siap dalam mengikuti proses belajar selanjutnya. Diperlukan rancangan pembelajaran yang dapat dijadikan guru sebagai rujukan dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran. Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) dalam pembelajaran pembagian pecahan dapat diintegrasikan dengan materi/konsep lain. Kata Kunci    :   realistik, pembagian pecahan, integrasi  ABSTRACTThe result of learning fraction is expected suitable with the objectives that have been set. In fact the students have difficulties in completing fractionas. In carrying out the process of learning the teacher should consider the students readiness to follow the learning process. Efforts is to choose the knowledge of students from their learning experiences that can be used to bridge between learning experience with new material, so they are better prepared to follow the learning process further. Required learning design that can be used by teacher as a reference in implementing the learning. To implement the approach of Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education (PMRI) in learning fractions can be integrated with the material / other concepts. Keywords:            realistics, division of fractions , integrated

Article Details

References

  1. Arla Westenskow. (2012). Equivalent Fraction Learning Trajectories for Students with Mathematical Learning Difficulties When Using Manipulatives, Disertasi. Utah State University Digital Commons@USU. Logan, Utah.
  2. Capraro, Robert M., Emilie A. Naiser, and Wendy E. Wright. "Teaching fractions: strategies used for tea ching fractions t o middle grades students." Journal of Research in Childhood Education 18.3 (2004): 193+. Gale Education, Religion and Humanities Lite Package. Web. 29 Oct. 2013.http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA116669570&v=2.1&u=kpt01029&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w&asid=fafaf1dfcca89ff0deb75b6670e5c27b.
  3. Dahar, R.W. (1988). Teori-teori Belajar. Dirjen Dikti, Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan, Tenaga Kependidikan Jakarta.
  4. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing Realistic Mathematics Education, Utrech: Fruedenthal Institute.
  5. Morge, Shelby P. (2011). "Helping children understand fraction concepts using various contexts and interpretations." Childhood Education 87.4 : 282+. Gale Education, Religion and Humanities Lite Package. Web. 29 Oct. 2013.http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA254482618&v=2.1&u=kpt01029&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w&asid=60eec8a022554eb3a85faddec1edea12
  6. Soedjadi. (1999/2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Konstatasi Keadaan Masa Kini Menuju Harapan Masa Depan. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta:Depdiknas.
  7. Yeping Li and Dennie Smith (2007). Prospective Middle School Teachers’ Knowledge In Mathematics And Pedagogy For Teaching – The Case Of Fraction Division. In Woo, J. H., Lew, H. C., Park, K. S. & Seo, D. Y Eds.). Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 185-192. Seoul: PME. Texas A&M University, U.S.A. http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME31/3/185.pdf