Article Sidebar

Published
Apr 27, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 474 Download : 678

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aimed to produce PISA-like mathematics problems with the Islamic ethnomathematics approach that were valid and practical. A development study with formative evaluation was used as the method in this study with 32 9th-grade students as the subjects at one of the junior high schools in Palembang, South Sumatra province, Indonesia. There are five phases: self-evaluation, expert review, one-to-one, small group, and field test. Interviews, questionnaires, and tests were used in this study as the instruments to collect the data. The results showed that three experts from the expert review phase assess that 77.78% agree that six PISA-like mathematics problems meet the validity criteria. For the practicality criteria, three students from the one-to-one step set about 77,78% agree, three students from the small group phase assessed about 61,11% strongly agree, and 26 students from the field test phase considered 61,33% agree. This result is supported by the average test result that was classified as a low category. This showed that the results obtained are not optimal because students still did not understand the problems and had difficulty solving them.

Keywords

Islamic Ethnomathematics Mathematics Problem PISA

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhammad Win Afgani, UIN Raden Fatah

Mathematics Education Department

References

  1.  

  2. Afgani, M. W., & Paradesa, R. (2019). Perbedaan skala pada sumbu koordinat kartesius: apa dampaknya dalam pembelajaran integral tentu?. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 121-130. doi:10.22342/jpm.13.2.6819.121-130

  3. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  4. Afgani, M. W. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman matematis dan konsep diri mahasiswa calon guru matematika melalui penerapan siklus pembelajaran aktivitas-diskusi-latihan berdasarkan teori APOS. Doctoral dissertation. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

  5. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  6.  

  7. Aprianti., & Kesumawati, N. (2019). Pengaruh model auditory intellectual repetition terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari disposisi matematis di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 5(1), 10-21. doi:10.19109/jpmrafa.v5i1.2729

  8. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  9. Cahyani, P. A. (2019). Kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik melalui model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dengan berbantuan alat peraga “kartu pintar” pada materi prisma dan limas kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Pandaan tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 5(1), 28-36. doi:10.33474/jpm.v5i1.2627

  10. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  11. Charmila, N., Zulkardi, Z., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA menggunakan konteks jambi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 198-207. doi:10.21831/pep.v20i2.7444

  12. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  13.  

  14. Damayanti, E. R., & Yunianta, T. N. H. (2018). The profile of junior high school students’ problem solving in answering the content pisa test of uncertainty and data based on ideal problem solving. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 250-264. doi:10.24252/mapan.2018v6n2a10

  15. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  16.  

  17. Handini, L., Amilda, A., & Arifin, S. (2015). Pengaruh pendekatan open ended dalam pembelajaran matematika terhadap kemampuan penalaran siswa kelas VII di SMP PTI Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 1(2), 204-223.

  18. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  19. Hasanah, H. (2017). Efektivitas soal-soal matematika tipe PISA menggunakan konteks budaya Sumatera Utara untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP Kota Medan. AXIOM: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika, 6(1).

  20. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  21.  

  22. Kehi, Y. J., Mastur, Z., & Waluya, St. B. (2019). Kontribusi etnomatematika sebagai masalah kontekstual dalam mengembangkan literasi matematika. PRISMA, 2, 190-196.

  23. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  24.  

  25. Mardhiyanti, D., Ilma, R., & Kesumawati, N. (2011). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA untuk mengukur kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). doi:10.22342/jpm.5.1.334.

  26. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  27.  

  28. Masamah, U. (2018). Pengembangan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan etnomatematika berbasis budaya lokal Kudus. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Kudus), 1(2), 123-144. doi:10.21043/jpm.v1i2.4882

  29. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  30.  

  31. McKinney, S., & Frazier, W. (2008). Embracing the principles and standards for school mathematics: An inquiry into the pedagogical and instructional practices of mathematics teachers in high-poverty middle schools. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(5), 201-210. doi:10.3200/TCHS.81.5.201-210

  32. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  33. Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic Indonesia [MECRI]. (2016). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik Indonesia nomor 22 tahun 2016 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

  34. [Article]


  35. Muslimahayati, M. (2019). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dengan pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik bernuansa etnomatematika (PMRE). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 5(1), 22-40. doi:10.19109/jpmrafa.v5i1.3773

  36. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  37. Napitupulu, E. E., Suryadi, D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). Cultivating upper secondary students’ mathematical reasoning-ability and attitude towards mathematics through problem-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 117-128. doi:10.22342/jme.7.2.3542.117-128

  38. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  39.  


  40. Nizar, H., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2018). PISA-like mathematics problem with karate context in Asian Games. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012063. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012063

  41. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  42. Oktaviana, D. V., Syafrimen, S., & Putra, R. W. Y. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa kelas IX MTs dalam menyelesaikan soal model PISA pada konten perubahan dan hubungan. Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains Matematika (JES-MAT), 4(1), 47-56. doi:10.25134/jes-mat.v4i1.909

  43. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  44. Putra, Y. Y., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA level 4, 5, 6 menggunakan konteks lampung. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(1), 10-16. doi:10.15294/kreano.v7i1.4832

  45. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  46. Susanti, D., & Suparman, S. (2018). Analisis kebutuhan lembar kerja siswa etnomatematika batik geometri transformasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Etnomatnesia, 1, 209-213.

  47. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  48. Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. London: Psychology Press.

  49. [Google Scholar]


  50. Utari, R. S. (2017). Desain pembelajaran materi perbandingan menggunakan konteks resep empek-empek untuk medukung kemampuan bernalar siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 3(1), 103-121. doi:10.19109/jpmrafa.v3i1.1444

  51. [Article]     [Google Scholar]

  52.  

  53. Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In Design approaches and tools in education and training, 1-14. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_1

  54. [Article]     [Google Scholar]


  55. Zulkardi, Z. (2002). Developing a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers. Doctoral dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.

  56. [Article]     [Google Scholar]