Article Sidebar

Published
Feb 23, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 323 Download : 411

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to produce online learning games on linear program subjects for 3rd-semester students that are valid, practical, efective and can increase student learning motivation. Students are less interested in linear program subject because it requires high analysis skill and feel boring. This research and development model consisting of the stages of define (literature study and field survey), design (early product design activities), develop (expert validation, product revisions, and development testing), and disseminate (final product revision) with descriptive analysis techniques qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative descriptive analysis techniques are used to describe the stages of development that describe the results of observations of the implementation and effectiveness of online learning games that have been developed in the field. Quantitative descriptive analysis techniques are used at the development stages. This study has achieved the expected goal: producing online learning games for linear program subjects that are valid (very good category), practical (very good category), and effective (85.71% of students had achieve a minimum score of C).

Keywords

Learning Games Linear Programs Online

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Aleksić, V., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z., & Popescu, E. (2016). Commercial off-the-shelf games as learning media Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies 2016, Palermo, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983468.2983493

  2. Apsari, P. N., & Rizki, S. (2018). Media pembelajaran matematika berbasis android pada materi program linear [Android-based mathematics learning media on linear programming material]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v7i1.1357

  3. Ariawan, B. (2015). Menyelesaikan permasalahan program linear menggunakan Geogebra. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan.

  4. Ariawan, B., Muhsetyo, G., & Qohar, A. (2017). Pengembangan edutainment multimedia untuk meningkatkan minat dan hasil belajar program linier siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(6), 780-789.

  5. Bawa, P. (2019). Using Kahoot to inspire. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(3), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518804173

  6. Becker, K. (2007). Digital game‐based learning once removed: Teaching teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00711.x

  7. Çalışkan, H., & Kaşıkçı, Y. (2010). The application of traditional and alternative assessment and evaluation tools by teachers in social studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4152-4156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.656

  8. ÇETİN, H. S. (2018). Implementation of the digital assessment tool Kahoot in elementary school. International Technology and Education Journal, 2(1), 9-20.

  9. Ding, D., Guan, C., & Yu, Y. (2017). Game-based learning in tertiary education: A new learning experience for the generation Z. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(2), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.2.857

  10. Ekanayake, S. Y., & Wishart, J. (2014). Mobile phone images and video in science teaching and learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.825628

  11. Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching methods and students’ academic performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(9), 29-35.

  12. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Mobile apps for language learning. Language learning & technology, 15(2), 2-11.

  13. Hidayat, R. (2018). Game-based learning: Academic games sebagai metode penunjang pembelajaran kewirausahaan. Buletin Psikologi, 26(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.30988

  14. Hughes, J. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 345-362.

  15. Kalyani, D., & Rajasekaran, K. (2018). Innovative teaching and learning. Journal of applied and advanced research, 3(1), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3is1.162

  16. Pivec, M., & Kearney, P. (2007). Games for learning and learning from games. Informatica, 31(4).

  17. Plump, C. M., & LaRosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active Learning: A game-based technology solution for elearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298116689783

  18. Saparwadi, L., & Aini, Q. (2016). Identifikasi permasalahan pembelajaran mahasiswa pendidikan matematika pada mata kuliah program linear: Studi kasus pada program studi pendidikan Matematika. Jurnal Tatsqif, 14(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v14i1.20

  19. Wahid, A. H., Najiburrahman, Rahman, K., Faiz, Qodriyah, K., Hambali, El Iq Bali, M. M., Baharun, H., & Muali, C. (2020). Effectiveness of android-based mathematics learning media application on student learning achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1594(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1594/1/012047

  20. Wahyudi, W., Ambarwati, M., & Indarini, E. (2019). Development of web game learning materials for primary school students. Infinity Journal, 8(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p199-208

  21. Wardani, D. K., Martono, T., Pratomo, L. C., Rusydi, D. S., & Kusuma, D. H. (2018). Online learning in higher education to encourage critical thinking skills in the 21st century. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.517973

  22. Wijaya, T. T. (2020). How chinese students learn mathematics during the coronavirus pandemic. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4950

  23. Yilmaz, R. M., & Baydas, O. (2017). An examination of undergraduates’ metacognitive strategies in pre-class asynchronous activity in a flipped classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1547-1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9534-1

  24. Yu, F., & Conway, A. (2012). Mobile/smartphone use in higher education. Proceedings of the 2012 Southwest Decision Sciences Institute, 831-839.