Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain an overview of the student's Statistical Literacy model in Statistics learning in Higher Education. Researchers conducted an in-depth study of student statistical literacy, how they understand and apply statistics, how statistics are used as a tool for reliable data that can be trusted as scientific works. The research method uses qualitative research methods with a Grounded Theory approach. Participants involved in this study were 114 participants from several universities in West Java, Indonesia. The results of this study found a student statistical literacy model consisting of 2 dimensions and 5 elements. Dimensions of Statistical Knowledge: Descriptive Statistics, Inference Statistics, Statistical Communication and Statistical Reasoning. Attitude Dimensions: Confidence and Critical Attitude.

Keywords

Grounded Theory Statistical Literacy

Article Details

Author Biography

Lukman Lukman, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Department Mathematics Education

References

  1. Allen, R., Folkhard, A., Abram, B., & Lancaster, G. (2010). Statistics for the biological and environmental sciences: improving service teaching for postgraduates. In The Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS8).

  2. Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 147-168). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_7

  3. Batanero, C., Godino, J. D., Vallecillos, A., Green, D. R., & Holmes, P. (1994). Errors and difficulties in understanding elementary statistical concepts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 25(4), 527-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739940250406

  4. Batanero, C., Tauber, L. M., & Sánchez, V. (2004). Students’ reasoning about the normal distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 257-276). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_11

  5. Bellinga, P., & Gillebaart, T. (2018). How to collaborate with the media to enhance statistical literacy of the general public. In the Tenth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS10).

  6. Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking: Goals, Definitions, and Challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 3-15). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_1

  7. Chametzky, B. (2016). Coding in classic grounded theory: i’ve done an interview; now what? Sociology Mind, 6(4), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2016.64014

  8. Chance, B., del Mas, R., & Garfield, J. (2004). Reasoning about sampling distribitions. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 295-323). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_13

  9. Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory in global perspective: Reviews by international researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074-1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414545235

  10. Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1997.11990723

  11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

  12. De Finetti, B. (1989). Probabilism. Erkenntnis, 31(2), 169-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236563

  13. Gal, I. (2002). Adults' statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, 70(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403713

  14. Gal, I. (2004). Statistical Literacy. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 47-78). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_3

  15. Gal, I., & Ginsburg, L. (1994). The role of beliefs and attitudes in learning statistics: Towards an assessment framework. Journal of Statistics Education, 2(2), null-null. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.1994.11910471

  16. Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, 63(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403775

  17. Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education JRME, 19(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.1.0044

  18. Garfield, J., & Ben‐Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International statistical review, 75(3), 372-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00029.x

  19. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. USA and London: Aldine transaction A Division of Transaction Publishers.

  20. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1995). La production de la théorie à partir des données. Enquête. Archives de la revue Enquête(1), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.4000/enquete.282

  21. Goulding, C. (1999). Grounded Theory: some reflections on paradigm, procedures and misconceptions. http://hdl.handle.net/2436/11403

  22. Hotelling, H. (1951). The Impact of R. A. Fisher on Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46(253), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500765

  23. Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Conceptualizing an average as a stable feature of a noisy process. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 169-199). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_8

  24. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human communication research, 30(3), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x

  25. Meng, X.-L. (2009). Desired and feared—What do we do now and over the next 50 years? The American Statistician, 63(3), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.09045

  26. Moritz, J. (2004). Reasoning about covariation. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 227-255). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_10

  27. Neyman, J. (1956). Note on an article by Sir Ronald Fisher. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 18(2), 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1956.tb00236.x

  28. Noha, M. R. (2013). The importance of statistical analysis in the development of the capabilities of faculty members in the BAU. International Journal of Education, 5(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v5i2.2905

  29. Reading, C., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2004). Reasoning about variation. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 201-226). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_9

  30. Sharma, S. (2017). Definitions and models of statistical literacy: a literature review. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313

  31. Smith, T., & Staetsky, L. (2007). The teaching of statistics in UK universities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170(3), 581-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00482.x

  32. Spiegelhalter, D., & Riesch, H. (2008). Bacon sandwiches and middle–class drinkers: the risk of communicating risk. Significance, 5(1), 30-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2008.00277.x

  33. Tishkovskaya, S., & Lancaster, G. A. (2012). Statistical education in the 21st century: A review of challenges, teaching innovations and strategies for reform. Journal of Statistics Education, 20(2), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2012.11889641

  34. Verhoeven, P. (2006). Statistics education in the Netherlands and Flanders: An outline of introductory courses at Universities and Colleges. In ICOTS-7 Conference Proceedings.

  35. Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3-46.

  36. Watson, J. M. (2004). Developing reasoning about samples. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 277-294). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_12