Exploring contributing factors to PISA 2022 mathematics achievement: Insights from Indonesian teachers
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
As an international benchmark, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022 evaluates the educational performance of 15-year-old students across various countries. It has been observed that the average mathematics score globally declined in 2022. Understanding the responses of mathematics teachers, as practitioners, to the PISA 2022 results is crucial for evaluating the reasons behind this decline in mathematics scores. This research aims to explore and understand the perspectives of Indonesian mathematics teachers on the factors contributing to the low PISA 2022 mathematics scores. This study employs a qualitative approach, with participants being randomly selected and includes interviews with 36 mathematics teachers in Indonesia. According to the statements provided by teachers, the decline in mathematics scores in the 2022 PISA, relative to the years 2018 and 2015, can be attributed to six primary factors: pandemic-related issues, curriculum, individual factors, resource limitations, student factors, and parental involvement. Subsequently, mathematics teachers provided several recommendations for the government, schools, and parents that might enhance student mathematics achievement. These recommendations include conducting more training, improving ICT facilities in schools, and strengthening parental knowledge about the importance of parental support. The findings of this study offer various recommendations that could be implemented by the government, schools, and mathematics teachers to improve student mathematical achievement and potentially increase PISA scores in 2025.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.References
Afgani, M. W., & Paradesa, R. (2021). PISA-Like problems using Islamic ethnomathematics approach. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p203-216
Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2023). Changing representations of student achievement: The need for innovation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2192513
Alfaruki, A. A. (2022). The concept of merdeka belajar from the view of constructivism. EL-TARBAWI, 15(2), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.20885/tarbawi.vol15.iss2.art4
Al-Tameemi, R. A. N., Johnson, C., Gitay, R., Abdel-Salam, A.-S. G., Hazaa, K. A., BenSaid, A., & Romanowski, M. H. (2023). Determinants of poor academic performance among undergraduate students—A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100232
Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13(1), 79-107. https://doi.org/10.28945/3958
Andrietti, V., & Su, X. (2019). Education curriculum and student achievement: theory and evidence. Education Economics, 27(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1527894
Atasoy, R., Çoban, Ö., & Yatağan, M. (2022). Effect of ICT use, parental support and student hindering on science achievement: Evidence from PISA 2018. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.945869
Attard, L., & Busuttil, L. (2020). Teacher perspectives on introducing programming constructs through coding mobile-based games to secondary school students. Informatics in Education, 19(4), 543-568. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.24
Aydin, H., Ozfidan, B., & Carothers, D. (2017). Meeting the challenges of curriculum and instruction in school settings in the United States. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 76-92.
Betthäuser, B. A., Bach-Mortensen, A. M., & Engzell, P. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01506-4
Bustomi, A., Zuhairi, Z., & Ilmudinulloh, R. (2021). The problems of learning media at university amid COVID 19 post new normal in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra', 15(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v15i2.1564
Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3443-3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
Crato, N. (2021). Setting up the scene: Lessons learned from PISA 2018 statistics and other international student assessments. In N. Crato (Ed.), Improving a country’s education: PISA 2018 results in 10 countries (pp. 1-24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4_1
Curtis, K. M. (2006). Improving student attitudes: A study of a mathematics curriculum innovation. Kansas State University.
Dewantara, A. H., Setiawati, F. A., & Saraswati, S. (2023). Towards numeracy literacy development: A single-case study on the use of the living book homeschooling model. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p225-242
Edumadze, J. K. E., Barfi, K. A., Arkorful, V., & Baffour Jnr, N. O. (2023). Undergraduate student's perception of using video conferencing tools under lockdown amidst COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5799-5810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2018618
Ekawati, R., Susanti, S., & Chen, J.-C. (2020). Primary students’ mathematical literacy: A case study. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p49-58
Foster, N., & Schleicher, A. (2022). Assessing creative skills. Creative Education, 13(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.131001
Guo, J. R., Liu, Y., Chen, Y. R., Chai, G. L., & Zhao, X. Q. (2022). Psychological support for public-funded normal students engaged in teaching profession. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 940431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940431
Habibi, A., Razak, R. A., Yusop, F. D., Mukminin, A., & Yaqin, L. N. (2020). Factors affecting ICT integration during teaching practices: A multiple case study of three Indonesian universities. Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4150
Harisman, Y., Mayani, D. E., Armiati, A., Syaputra, H., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2023). Analysis of student's ability to solve mathematical literacy problems in junior high schools in the city area. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p55-68
Harisman, Y., Noto, M. S., & Hidayat, W. (2020). Experience student background and their behavior in problem solving. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p59-68
Hendriana, H., Prahmana, R. C. I., Ristiana, M. G., Rohaeti, E. E., & Hidayat, W. (2022). The theoretical framework on humanist ethno-metaphorical mathematics learning model: An impactful insight in learning mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1030471. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1030471
Hidayat, W., & Aripin, U. (2023). How to develop an e-LKPD with a scientific approach to achieving students' mathematical communication abilities? Infinity Journal, 12(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p85-100
Hidayat, W., & Husnussalam, H. (2019). The adversity quotient and mathematical understanding ability of pre-service mathematics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012025
Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., Ginanjar, A., & Putri, R. I. I. (2022). An ePub learning module and students' mathematical reasoning ability: A development study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp103-118
Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., Hamidah, I., & Putri, R. I. I. (2023). How can android-based trigonometry learning improve the math learning process? Frontiers in Education, 7, 1016. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1101161
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J.-A. (2018). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the programme for international student assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
Hsiao, C.-C., Tiao, M.-M., & Chen, C.-C. (2016). Using interactive multimedia e-Books for learning blood cell morphology in pediatric hematology. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0816-9
Hutajulu, M., Wijaya, T. T., & Hidayat, W. (2019). The effect of mathematical disposition and learning motivation on problem solving: An analysis. Infinity Journal, 8(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p229-238
Kartianom, K., & Ndayizeye, O. (2017). What‘s wrong with the Asian and African students’ mathematics learning achievement? The multilevel PISA 2015 data analysis for Indonesia, Japan, and Algeria. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.16931
Kaur, B., Zhu, Y., & Cheang, W. K. (2019). Singapore’s participation in international benchmark studies—TIMSS, PISA and TEDS-M. In T. L. Toh, B. Kaur, & E. G. Tay (Eds.), Mathematics Education in Singapore (pp. 101-137). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3573-0_6
Kemdikbudristek. (2023). PISA 2022 dan pemulihan pembelajaran di Indonesia - Laporan PISA Kemdikbudristek [PISA 2022 and learning recovery in Indonesia - Kemdikbudristek PISA Report]. Kemdikbudristek. Retrieved from: https://lpmpdki.kemdikbud.go.id/pisa-2022-dan-pemulihan-pembelajaran-di-indonesia
Khine, M. S., Fraser, B. J., Afari, E., & Liu, Y. (2023). Language learning environments and reading achievement among students in China: evidence from PISA 2018 data. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09404-8
Kilenthong, W. T., Boonsanong, K., Duangchaiyoosook, S., Jantorn, W., & Khruapradit, V. (2023). Learning losses from school closure due to the COVID-19 pandemic for Thai kindergartners. Economics of Education Review, 96, 102455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102455
Kurniansyah, M. Y., Hidayat, W., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2022). Development of combined module using contextual scientific approach to enhance students' cognitive and affective. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p349-366
Laelasari, L., Darhim, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Analysis of students’ mathematics resilience abilities on linear program material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4), 042005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042005
Lawson-Body, A., Willoughby, L., Lawson-Body, L., & Tamandja, E. M. (2020). Students’ acceptance of E-books: An application of UTAUT. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(3), 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1463577
Lestari, D. I., Waluya, S. B., & Mulyono, M. (2020). Mathematical literacy ability and self-efficacy students in search solve create and share (SSCS) learning with contextual approaches. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 9(2), 156-162.
Lewis, S. (2017). Communities of practice and PISA for schools: Comparative learning or a mode of educational governance? Education policy analysis archives, 25(92), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2901
Limaymanta, C., Apaza-Tapia, L., Vidal, E., & Gregorio-Chaviano, O. (2021). Flipped classroom in higher education: A bibliometric analysis and proposal of a framework for its implementation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(9), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.21267
Ma, L., Luo, H., & Xiao, L. (2021). Perceived teacher support, self-concept, enjoyment and achievement in reading: A multilevel mediation model based on PISA 2018. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101947
Martinovic, D., & Manizade, A. G. (2020). Teachers using geogebra to visualize and verify conjectures about prapezoids. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(3), 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00103-9
Meroni, E. C., Vera-Toscano, E., & Costa, P. (2015). Can low skill teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.02.006
Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Riady, Y., Alqahtani, T. M., Chaerunisaa, A. Y., Wijaya, T. T., Milanda, T., Yusop, F. D., & Albelbisi, N. A. (2023). COVID-19 distance and online learning: A systematic literature review in pharmacy education. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04346-6
Mustafa, Z., & Salim, H. (2012). Factors affecting students’ interest in learning Islamic education. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(13), 81-86.
Navarro-Martinez, O., & Peña-Acuña, B. (2022). Technology usage and academic performance in the PISA 2018 report. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 11(1), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2022.1.735
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Onitsuka, K., Hidayat, A. R. R. T., & Huang, W. (2018). Challenges for the next level of digital divide in rural Indonesian communities. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 84(2), e12021. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12021
Pandey, D., Ogunmola, G. A., Enbeyle, W., Abdullahi, M., Pandey, B. K., & Pramanik, S. (2022). COVID-19: A framework for effective delivering of online classes during lockdown. Human Arenas, 5(2), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00175-x
Pertiwi, C. M., Rohaeti, E. E., & Hidayat, W. (2021). The students' mathematical problem-solving abilities, self-regulated learning, and VBA microsoft word in new normal: A development of teaching materials. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p17-30
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Puad, L. M. A. Z., & Ashton, K. (2023). A critical analysis of Indonesia's 2013 national curriculum: Tensions between global and local concerns. The Curriculum Journal, 34(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.194
Putra, Z. H., Witri, G., & Sari, I. K. (2020). Prospective elementary teachers’ perspectives on online mathematics learning during corona virus outbreak. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012057
Rohaeti, E. E., Evans, B. R., Wiyatno, T., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, W. (2023). Differential learning assisted with SANTUY mobile application for improving students’ mathematical understanding and ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp275-292
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). Problem-based learning and student motivation: The role of interest in learning and achievement. In G. O'Grady, E. H. J. Yew, K. P. L. Goh, & H. G. Schmidt (Eds.), One-Day, One-Problem: An Approach to Problem-based Learning (pp. 85-101). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-75-3_5
Sistyawati, R. I., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., Samsuriyadi, S., Alwi, Z., Sepriliani, S. P., Tanjung, A. L., Pratiwi, R. P., Aprilisa, S., & Nusantara, D. S. (2023). Development of PISA types of questions and activities content shape and space context pandemic period. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p1-12
Sjøberg, S., & Jenkins, E. (2022). PISA: A political project and a research agenda. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1824473
Supianti, I. I., Yaniawati, P., Osman, S. Z. M., Al-Tamar, J., & Lestari, N. (2022). Development of teaching materials for e-learning-based statistics materials oriented towards the mathematical literacy ability of vocational high school students. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p237-254
Tamur, M., Ndiung, S., Weinhandl, R., Wijaya, T. T., Jehadus, E., & Sennen, E. (2023). Meta-analysis of computer-based mathematics learning in the last decade Scopus database: Trends and implications. Infinity Journal, 12(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p101-116
Umbara, U., Prabawanto, S., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2023). Combination of mathematical literacy with ethnomathematics: How to perspective sundanese culture. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 393-414. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p393-414
Wang, X. S., Perry, L. B., Malpique, A., & Ide, T. (2023). Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: a systematic review. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8
Wijaya, T. T., Mutmainah, I. I., Suryani, N., Azizah, D., Fitri, A., Hermita, N., & Tohir, M. (2021). Nineth grade students mistakes when solving congruence and similarity problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2049(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2049/1/012066
Wijaya, T. T., Rahmadi, I. F., Chotimah, S., Jailani, J., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2022). A case study of factors that affect secondary school mathematics achievement: Teacher-parent support, stress levels, and students' well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316247
Xiao, F., & Sun, L. (2021). Students’ motivation and affection profiles and their relation to mathematics achievement, persistence, and behaviors. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 533593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.533593
Ying, L., Kai, L., Mo, C., & Leyi, L. (2017). The Innovation and Practice of Engineering Drawing Teaching Based on All-Around Opening Labs. Journal of Graphics, 38(1), 123-127.