Main Article Content

Abstract

In learning process, students are currently cannot be separated from learning difficulties, including the study material algebra limit function. It because the level of students' mathematical understanding regarding the material is still quite low. This study aimed to analyze the barriers to student learning, designing learning materials based on the material mathematics understanding algebra limit function is valid, determine teacher intervention during the implementation of learning materials and to analyze barriers to student learning after the implementation of learning materials. This research is a qualitative research study design using the form Didactical Design Research. Stages of research conducted: 1) analysis of the situation didactic before learning, 2) analysis of metapedadidatik and 3) the retrospective analysis. Data collection techniques used were tests, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. The instrument used was a matter TKPM (Comprehension Mathematical Ability Test), interview, validation sheet materials, and documentation guidelines. Research results obtained are students experiencing obstacle to learning the material limit algebra functions. These obstacles are 1) students' difficulties in relating the material prerequisites to limit problems. 2) students can not write properly limit symbol, 3) students can not apply a limit theorem, 4) students are not able to determine the limit value at one point, and 5) students cannot determine the value of the limit at infinity. Learning materials that have been made have validation level of  with very valid criteria. The response was given when the student intervention, generally in accordance with response prediction so that interventions carried out in accordance with the design that has been made. After learning materials student learning obstacles implemented reduced/minimized.

Keywords

Learning Obstacle Mathematical Understanding Didactical Design Research Limit Functions Algebra.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Surya Amami Pramuditya, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Djati, Jl. Perjuangan 1, Cirebon

Department of Mathematics Education

Yudrick Maulana Fiqri, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Djati, Jl. Perjuangan 1, Cirebon

Department of Mathematics Education

References

  1. Akbar, S. D. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  2. Brousseau, G. (2006). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (Vol. 19). Springer Science & Business Media.
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  4. Fauzi, K. M. A. (2012). Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa dengan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Metakognitif di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Paradikma, 6(1), 49-74.
  5. Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity Quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Turunan Fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15-28.
  6. Noto, M. S., Hartono, W., & Sundawan, D. (2016). Analysis Of Students Mathematical Representation And Connection On Analytical Geometry Subject. Infinity Journal, 5(2), 99-108.
  7. Ratnasari, I. (2014). Perbandingan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Antara Siswa Yang Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Dan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation (Gi) Pada Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri 2 Jalaksana. Euclid, 1(1).
  8. Rizki, S., & Syutaridho, S. (2014). Efektivitas Bahan Ajar Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Menggunakan 5E Instructional Model terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 1-9.
  9. Sarah, S., Suryadi, D., & Fatimah, S. (2017). Desain Didaktis Konsep Volume Limas pada Pembelajaran Matematika SMP berdasarkan Learning Trajectory. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 31-42.
  10. Suhandri, S. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa SMP/MTs dengan Menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(2), 240-249.
  11. Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical Research (DDR) Dalam Mengembangkan Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika. FMIPA UNNES.
  12. Wahyuni, I., & Kharimah, N. I. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Penalaran Matematis Mahasiswa Tingkat IV Materi Sistem Bilangan Kompleks pada Mata Kuliah Analisis Kompleks. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 1(2), 228-240.
  13. Warsitasari, W. D. (2015). Berpikir Aljabar dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. APOTEMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1-17.