Main Article Content


This study aims to examine the misconceptions that often occur in junior high school students on the concept of geometry based on abstraction level. The research method is qualitative with a case study design. Subjects in this study are 27 students of the 3rd grade of junior high school students, who had to learn all the concepts that will be appeared on the test. Material that will be given on the test of this research is the concept of Triangle, Quadrilateral, Flat Side Geometry and Curved Side Geometry. This research takes a place at one of the junior high schools in Cimahi. The instrument in this study is a diagnostic test (to find out the types of students’ misconception), mathematical abstraction tests (to determine the level of abstraction) and interview rubrics. Misconceptions produced by students are closely related to students’ mathematical abstractions, the higher the level of abstraction ability, the more students away from misconceptions. The topic taken in this study is the topic of basic geometry, the results can be a source of information about the types of misconception that often occur in students, and how the solution so that these misconception do not re-occur.


Abstraction Geometry Misconception

Article Details


  1. Adolphus, T. (2011). Problems of teaching and learning of geometry in secondary schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 1(2), 143-152.
  2. Ay, Y. (2017). A Review Of Research On The Misconceptions In Mathematics Education. Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 21–31.
  3. Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (s. 843-908). Charlotte, NC: NCTM. Information Age Publishing.
  4. Dayanti, P., Sugiatno, S., & Nursangaji, A. (2019). Miskonsepsi siswa dikaji dari gaya kognitif dalam materi jajargenjang di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 8(9).
  5. Fitriani, N. (2018). Proses Abstraksi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Konsep Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education dengan Model Van Hiele. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  6. Fitriani, N., Suryadi, D., & Darhim, D. (2018). Analysis of mathematical abstraction on concept of a three dimensional figure with curved surfaces of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 012037. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012037
  7. Goodson-Espy, T. (1998). The roles of reification and reflective abstraction in the development of abstract thought: Transitions from arithmetic to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(3), 219–245. doi:10.1023/A:1003473509628
  8. Hendriana, H., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Students’ performance skills in creative mathematical reasoning. Infinity Journal, 7(2), 83. doi:10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p83-96
  9. Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity quotient dan penalaran kreatif matematis siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran argument driven inquiry pada materi turunan fungsi. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 15–28. doi:10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol2no1.2017pp15-28
  10. Hong, J. Y., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Mathematical Abstraction in the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems by Elementary School Students in Korea. 12(2), 267–281. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1204a
  11. Hutagalung, E. E., Mulyana, E., & Pangaribuan, T. R. (2020). Mathematical abstraction : students ’ concept of triangles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032106
  12. Kadarisma, G. (2016). Improving Students’ Logical Thinking Mathematic Skill Through Learning Cycle 5E and Discovery Learning. Proceeding Of 3rd International Conference on Research Implementation Education Of Mathematics and Science.
  13. Kadarisma, G., Senjayawati, E., & Amelia, R. (2019). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012068. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012068
  14. Kusmaryono, I., Basir, M. A., & Saputro, B. A. (2020). Ontological Misconception In Mathematics Teaching In Elementary Schools. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 15–30. doi:10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p15-30
  15. Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18-29. doi:10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836
  16. Nurhasanah, F. (2018). Mathematical Abstraction Of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers In Learning Non-Conventional Mathematics Concepts. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  17. Ozerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720–729. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557
  18. Sanapiah, & Juliangkary, E. (2017). Profil Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa Ditinjau Berdasarkan Pengalaman Belajar Segitiga. ELPSA Conference, 1(1), 96–105.
  19. Syahbana, A. (2013). Alternatif Pemahaman Konsep Umum Volume Suatu Bangun Ruang. Edumatica, 3(2), 1-7.