Article Sidebar

Published
Feb 28, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 161 Download : 255

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematics plays an essential role in developing human thought, particularly in developing problem-solving and reasoning. While mathematics has become a problem-solving tool in various fields, including science, it has distinct qualities known as probability and, more specifically, probability theory. For most learners, the probability is difficult to learn and conceptualize. Hence, the present study investigates learners’ misconceptions in the teaching and learning of probability in a selected school in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Underpinned by a Post-positivist paradigm, the study employed a quantitative research approach and a survey design in which data were gathered from mathematics learners from grades 10-12. Findings revealed that although the frequency of misconceptions varied across grade levels, it was difficult to describe how misconceptions about probability changed. As such, while learners progressed through the grades, some misconceptions faded with age, others remained stable, and others grew in power. The findings also revealed that the types of probability misconceptions did not differ significantly by gender, and male learners tend to have more misconceptions about probability than female learners.

Keywords

Experiment Influence Misconception Outcomes Performance Probability Theory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ang, L. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Identifying students’ specific misconceptions in learning probability. International Journal of Probability and Statistics, 3(2), 23-29.

  2. Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. In C. Batanero, E. J. Chernoff, J. Engel, H. S. Lee, & E. Sánchez (Eds.), Research on teaching and learning probability (pp. 1-33). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3_1

  3. Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, S., & Valentino, L. (2015). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 45, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002

  4. Chernoff, E. J. (2012). Recognizing revisitation of the representativeness heuristic: an analysis of answer key attributes. Zdm, 44(7), 941-952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0435-9

  5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

  6. Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements: Grades R-12. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

  7. Fortin, N. M., Oreopoulos, P., & Phipps, S. (2015). Leaving boys behind. Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 549-579. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.3.549

  8. Gallagher, K. (2023). Overcoming misconceptions about probability a review of David J. hand’s the improbability principle. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 20(1), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1607

  9. Gauvrit, N., & Morsanyi, K. (2014). The equiprobability bias from a mathematical and psychological perspective. Advances in cognitive psychology, 10(4), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0163-9

  10. Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective. Developmental Psychology, 51(8), 1163-1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039440

  11. İlgün, M. (2013). An investigation of prospective elementary mathematics teachers' probabilistic misconceptions and reasons underlying these misconceptions. Master's thesis. Middle East Technical University. Retrieved from https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/22519

  12. Innabi, H., & Dodeen, H. (2018). Gender differences in mathematics achievement in Jordan: A differential item functioning analysis of the 2015 TIMSS. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3-4), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12269

  13. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747

  14. Kang, M., & Park, M. J. (2019). Employees’ judgment and decision making in the banking industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(1), 382-400. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2018-0111

  15. Kaplar, M., Lužanin, Z., & Verbić, S. (2021). Evidence of probability misconception in engineering students—why even an inaccurate explanation is better than no explanation. International journal of STEM education, 8(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00279-y

  16. Kennis, J. R. (2006). Probabilistic misconceptions across age and gender. Columbia University.

  17. Khazanov, L. (2005). An investigation of approaches and strategies for resolving students' misconceptions about probability in introductory college statistics. Dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/384aa801308d9d59db2fe76669af071d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

  18. Khazanov, L., & Gourgey, A. (2009). Instructors’ perspectives on students’ mistaken beliefs about probability in an elementary college statistics course. In proceedings of the Adults Learning Mathematics, a Research Forum (ALM) 15 th Annual International Conference, pp 249-264.

  19. Khazanov, L., & Prado, L. (2010). Correcting students' misconceptions about probability in an introductory college statistics course. Adults Learning Mathematics, 5(1), 23-35.

  20. Kustos, P., & Zelkowski, J. (2013). Grade-continuum trajectories of four known probabilistic misconceptions: What are students’ perceptions of self-efficacy in completing probability tasks? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 508-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.06.003

  21. Kustos, P. N. (2010). Trends concerning four misconceptions in students' intuitively-based probabilistic reasoning sourced in the heuristic of representativeness. Dissertation. The University of Alabama. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/ed71a91456fda59e831749d1dfff572a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

  22. Lecoutre, M.-P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in “purely random” situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540060

  23. Li, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., & Hao, Y. (2018). Gender differences in mathematics achievement in Beijing: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 566-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12203

  24. Makhubele, Y. E. (2015). Misconceptions and resulting errors displayed by grade 11 learners in the learning of geometry. Dissertation. University of Fort Hare. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10210/14112

  25. Marcenaro–Gutierrez, O., Lopez–Agudo, L. A., & Ropero-García, M. A. (2018). Gender differences in adolescents’ academic achievement. YOUNG, 26(3), 250-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308817715163

  26. Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 50-79. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679

  27. Mut, A. Ä°. (2003). Investigation of students probabilistic misconceptions. Thesis. Middle East Technical University. Retrieved from https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/2/1016500/index.pdf

  28. Mutara, L., & Makonye, J. (2016). Learners’ use of probability models in answering probability tasks in South Africa. In Promoting understanding of statistics about society, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Mathematical Education, July.

  29. Nicolson, C. (2005). Is chance fair? One student's thoughts on probability. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(2), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.12.2.0083

  30. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of economic perspectives, 24(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.129

  31. Olawale, B. E., Mncube, V., & Harber, C. R. (2021). Democratic citizenship education: Towards a model for establishing democratic mathematics teacher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(3), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-3-4681

  32. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex differences in mathematics and science achievement: A meta-analysis of national assessment of educational progress assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000012

  33. Santos-Trigo, M. (2020). Problem-solving in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 686-693). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_129

  34. Sharma, S. (2006). Personal experiences and beliefs in probabilistic reasoning: Implications for research. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/170

  35. Sharna, S., Sharma, S., Doyle, P., Marcelo, L., & Kumar, D. (2021). Teaching and learning probability using games: A systematic review of research from 2010-2020. Waikato Journal of Education, 26(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v26i2.881

  36. Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (pp. 465-494). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.

  37. Stylianides, A. J., Bieda, K. N., & Morselli, F. (2016). Proof and argumentation in mathematics education research. In Á. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: The journey continues (pp. 315-351). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_9

  38. Truran, K. (1994). Children’s understandings of random generators. In C. Beesey & D. Rasmussen (Eds.), Mathematics Without Limits (pp. 356-362). Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria.