Main Article Content


Proof of geometry is a topic that involves mathematical reasoning abilities and relates to perseverance involving hard work, the spirit of achievement, and self-confidence. The current important problem that occurs at this time is that students who are future teachers of mathematics still experience difficulties in compiling proofs, especially those who are not challenged to work hard. This qualitative research explores mathematics teacher candidates' reasoning abilities and perseverance in proving geometric theorems. Therefore, the research design used a case study. There were three participants in this study, and they were student prospective mathematics teachers' s taking geometry courses. Data were collected through working documents, open questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using iterative techniques consisting of data condensation, data exposure, and verification. The study's results showed that students' prospective teachers did not prioritize proof in solving geometry problems, even though they worked hard to solve the problems independently until they were finished. The students' perseverance also impacts their mathematical reasoning in proving geometric theorems. Students with more hard work values tend to have more reasoning values. The results of this study have implications that there needs to be an effort from the teacher to get used to giving proof questions to support students' perseverance and mathematical reasoning abilities.


Geometry theorem Mathematical reasoning Perseverance Proof

Article Details


  1. Amir, M. F., Hasanah, F. N., & Musthofa, H. (2018). Interactive multimedia based mathematics problem solving to develop students’ reasoning. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.14), 272-276.

  2. Barnes, A. (2021). Enjoyment in learning mathematics: its role as a potential barrier to children’s perseverance in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 45-63.

  3. Bettinger, E., Ludvigsen, S., Rege, M., Solli, I. F., & Yeager, D. (2018). Increasing perseverance in math: Evidence from a field experiment in Norway. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 146, 1-15.

  4. Cai, J., & Cirillo, M. (2014). What do we know about reasoning and proving? Opportunities and missing opportunities from curriculum analyses. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 132-140.

  5. Corriveau, C. (2017). Secondary-to-tertiary comparison through the lens of ways of doing mathematics in relation to functions: a study in collaboration with teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 139-160.

  6. Cyr, S. (2011). Development of beginning skills in proving and proof writing by elementary school students. In Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1-10).

  7. Di Martino, P., & Gregorio, F. (2019). The mathematical crisis in secondary–tertiary transition. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 825-843.

  8. DiNapoli, J. (2019). "Getting better at sticking with it": Examining perseverance improvement in secondary mathematics students. In Proceedings of the forty-first annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1386-1395). St Louis, MO

  9. DiNapoli, J. (2023). Distinguishing between grit, persistence, and perseverance for learning mathematics with understanding. Education Sciences, 13(4), 402.

  10. DiNapoli, J., & Miller, E. K. (2022). Recognizing, supporting, and improving student perseverance in mathematical problem-solving: The role of conceptual thinking scaffolds. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100965.

  11. Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. S., & Tanguay, D. (2012). Argumentation and proof in the mathematics classroom. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education: The 19th ICMI Study (pp. 349-367). Springer Netherlands.

  12. Firdausy, A. R., Triyanto, T., & Indriati, D. (2021). Mathematical reasoning abilities of high school students in solving contextual problems. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(1), 201-211.

  13. Fu, Y., Qi, C., & Wang, J. (2022). Reasoning and proof in algebra: The case of three reform-oriented textbooks in China. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 130-149.

  14. Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver is unsuccessful in his or her own way: affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 71-90.

  15. Güler, G. (2016). The difficulties experienced in teaching proof to prospective mathematics teachers: Academician views. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 145-158.

  16. Hanna, G. (2020). Mathematical proof, argumentation, and reasoning. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 561-566). Springer International Publishing.

  17. Hjelte, A., Schindler, M., & Nilsson, P. (2020). Kinds of mathematical reasoning addressed in empirical research in mathematics education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 10(10), 289.

  18. Jäder, J., Sidenvall, J., & Sumpter, L. (2017). Students’ mathematical reasoning and beliefs in non-routine task solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 759-776.

  19. Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1-16.

  20. Kurniansyah, M. Y., Hidayat, W., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2022). Development of combined module using contextual scientific approach to enhance students' cognitive and affective. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 349-366.

  21. Lee, D., Szegedy, C., Rabe, M. N., Loos, S. M., & Bansal, K. (2019). Mathematical reasoning in latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11851, 1-10.

  22. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis (4th ed.). Sage Publication Ltd.

  23. Nadlifah, M., & Prabawanto, S. (2017). Mathematical proof construction: Students’ ability in higher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012094.

  24. Nathan, M. J., Schenck, K. E., Vinsonhaler, R., Michaelis, J. E., Swart, M. I., & Walkington, C. (2021). Embodied geometric reasoning: Dynamic gestures during intuition, insight, and proof. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 929-948.

  25. Nurjanah, N., Dahlan, J. A., & Wibisono, Y. (2021). The effect of hands-on and computer-based learning activities on conceptual understanding and mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 143-160.

  26. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results Combined Executive Summaries. OECD Publishing.

  27. Oflaz, G., Bulut, N., & Akcakin, V. (2016). Pre-service classroom teachers’ proof schemes in geometry: A case study of three pre-service teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(63), 133–152.

  28. Ozdemir, E., & Ovez, F. T. D. (2012). A research on proof perceptions and attitudes towards proof and proving: Some implications for elementary mathematics prospective teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2121-2125.

  29. Öztürk, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). Cognitive analysis of constructing algebraic proof processes: A mixed method research. Egitim ve Bilim, 44(197), 25-64.

  30. Rohaeti, E. E., Fitriani, N., & Akbar, P. (2020). Developing an interactive learning model using visual basic applications with ethnomathematical contents to improve primary school students’ mathematical reasoning. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 275-286.

  31. Scherer, R., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2015). The relations among openness, perseverance, and performance in creative problem solving: A substantive-methodological approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 4-17.

  32. Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (2002). The evolution of mathematical reasoning: Everyday versus idealized understandings. Developmental Review, 22(2), 242-266.

  33. Selden, J., Benkhalti, A., & Selden, A. (2014). An analysis of transition-to-proof course students’ proof constructions with a view towards course redesign. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 246-259).

  34. Sengupta-Irving, T., & Agarwal, P. (2017). Conceptualizing perseverance in problem solving as collective enterprise. Mathematical thinking and learning, 19(2), 115-138.

  35. Smit, R., Dober, H., Hess, K., Bachmann, P., & Birri, T. (2022). Supporting primary students’ mathematical reasoning practice: the effects of formative feedback and the mediating role of self-efficacy. Research in Mathematics Education, 1-24.