Bringing the Real World into First Grade: Meaningful Based Learning Innovation to Improve Student Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Ajeng Tri Agustini Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Yeni Yuniarti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v10i2.7013

Keywords:

Classroom Action Research, First Grade, Learning Outcomes, Meaningful Learning, Real-World Context

Abstract

A persistent challenge in first-grade education is the disconnect between abstract curricular content and the concrete cognitive world of young learners, often leading to disengagement and superficial learning outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate a pedagogical innovation based on Meaningful Learning theory to improve student learning outcomes by systematically integrating real-world contexts into the first-grade curriculum. Employing a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design across two cycles, the study was conducted with 24 first-grade students. The intervention involved thematic, real-world learning modules (e.g., a class market, a garden project). Data were collected through learning outcome tests, structured observations, student interviews, and portfolio analysis, and were analyzed using mixed-methods (descriptive/inferential statistics and thematic analysis). The intervention yielded a statistically significant improvement in learning outcomes, with the mean test score increasing from 68.5 (pre-cycle) to 83.7 (post-cycle). Qualitative findings revealed a substantial increase in student engagement, collaborative problem-solving, and the ability to articulate the relevance of learned concepts. The iterative CAR process allowed for targeted refinements, enhancing the intervention's effectiveness in the second cycle. The findings conclusively demonstrate that a Meaningful Based Learning approach, which anchors academic instruction in authentic, real-world experiences, is highly effective in enhancing both cognitive and affective learning outcomes for first-grade students. This study provides a practical model for teachers to make learning more relevant and impactful in early primary education.

References

Abdullah, S. (2020). The implementation challenges of project-based learning at the primary level: A case study. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(2), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.82.100.114

Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2025). Cultivating Preservice Science Teachers’ TPACK and Self-Efficacy Beliefs through a Pedagogical Learning Course on Technology-Integrated Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry. J Sci Educ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10237-w

Bahtiar, B., & Fadhilah, U. (2021). Teacher collaboration for effective contextual learning. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijep.2021.0115

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (2022). Situated cognition and the culture of learning (revisited). Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2086421

Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development. Sustainability, 11(3), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030719

Chaisri, P., & Phanich, W. (2020). Place-based learning in Thai first-grade classrooms: Effects on science achievement and engagement. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 14(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jseae.2020.14.2.89

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2022). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529718792

Cahya, A. I., Iskandar, S., Abidin, Y., & Dewi, D. A. (2026). A Comparison of Classroom Management and Lesson Scheduling Elementary School in Southeast Asia: Implications for Student Learning Processes and Outcomes. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 194–205.

Cahya, A. I., Kurniawan, D. T., & Abidin, Y. (2025). Integrating STEM and Global Citizenship in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study of Student Character Values in Elementary Schools. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 34(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v34i12025p172-187

Chaisri, P., & Phanich, W. (2020). Place-based learning in Thai first-grade classrooms: Effects on science achievement and engagement. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 14(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jseae.2020.14.2.89

Garcia, E. (2022). Bridging the gap: From authentic learning theory to classroom practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1987241

George, A. S., Baskar, T., & Srikaanth, P. B. (2024). The erosion of cognitive skills in the technological age: How reliance on technology impacts critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, 2(3), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11671150

Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2020). Fostering complex problem solving for diverse learners: Engaging an ethos of intentionality toward equitable access. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 679–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09762-9

Ismail, N., & Lim, S. H. (2022). Contextual learning in Malaysian primary schools: A two-cycle action research study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2047891

Jones, B. D., & Lee, T. (2023). The role of situational interest in promoting engagement and learning in early elementary education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 72, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102115

Kan, T., Noordin, N., & Ismail, L. (2024). Implementation of Metacognitive Reading Strategies to Improve English Reading Ability: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Learning …. http://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2008

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2023). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8725-9

Knight, R. (2020). The tensions of innovation: Experiences of teachers during a whole school pedagogical shift. Research Papers in Education, 35(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1568527

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Novak, J. D. (2022). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315516319

Ramsay-Jordan, N. (2020). Preparation and the real world of education: How prospective teachers grapple with using culturally responsive teaching practices in the age of standardized testing. International Journal of Educational Reform, 29(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056787919877142

Rahmawati, Y., Zulfikar, A., & Kurniawan, A. (2023). Comparative analysis of meaningful learning interventions across Indonesian elementary schools. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 12(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijeces.v12i1.56789

Sari, D. P., & Wijaya, H. (2021). Project-based learning to improve mathematics outcomes in first-grade Indonesian students. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(4), 678–692. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.94.678.692

Smith, K. L. (2021). Contextual learning and knowledge retention in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 56(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.03.007

Tan, S. C., & Ng, L. L. (2021). Scaling up contextual learning: Lessons from Southeast Asian early education reform. Education Research for Policy and Practice, 20(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09285-7

Wilson, S. M., & Chen, I.-H. (2023). Teacher capacity and the implementation of pedagogical innovation: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103915

Zviel-Girshin, R., & Rosenberg, N. (2025). Enhancing early STEM engagement: The impact of inquiry-based robotics projects on first-grade students’ problem-solving self-efficacy and collaborative attitudes. Education Sciences, 15(10), 1404.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-27